FINRA Dispute Resolution Guidelines and Frequently Asked Questions for New Jersey Cases Involving Out-of-State Attorneys
Introduction
In January 2007, the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law in New Jersey (Committee) issued Opinion 43 to address an inquiry regarding whether an out-of-state attorney may appear before a panel of the American Arbitration Association in New Jersey.1 The Committee determined that an out-of-state attorney may represent a party in an arbitration proceeding conducted in New Jersey, if there has not been a complaint filed in New Jersey on the issue and if the attorney is admitted and in good standing in another jurisdiction.2 While Opinion 43 continues to permit representation by an out-of-state attorney in alternative dispute resolution forums, it changes the prerequisites for appearance by the out-of-state attorney.
According to Opinion 43, an out-of-state attorney must satisfy all of the requirements of Rule of Professional Conduct 5.5 (RPC 5.5).3 Further, Opinion 43 requires, as part of the initial filing process, that the out-of-state attorney provide proof of compliance with RPC 5.5 to the alternate dispute resolution forum, particularly proof of registration with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and payment of the required fees.
Guidelines for Attorneys Who Are Not Admitted to Practice in New Jersey
Based on the requirements set forth in Opinion 43, FINRA Dispute Resolution has developed the following guidelines for attorneys who are not admitted to practice in New Jersey (i.e., out-of-state attorneys).
Out-of-state attorneys may participate fully in an arbitration hearing on the merits held in a FINRA, New Jersey forum, provided that the out-of-state attorneys satisfy the following criteria:
First, the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct can be found on the web site of the New Jersey Judiciary at www.judiciary.state.nj.us > Supreme Court > Rules of Court > Part I Appendices > Rules of Professional Conduct.
Second, to register with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, out-of-state attorneys should complete a form, which requires the out-of-state attorneys to certify that they meet the criteria to practice in New Jersey, and to designate the New Jersey Supreme Court as the agent for service. The form can be found on the web site of the New Jersey Judiciary at www.judiciary.state.nj.us > Supreme Court > Form - Designation of Clerk as Agent for Service of Process - Multijurisdictional Practice. The form should be filed at the following address:
Clerk of the Supreme Court of New Jersey
Hughes Justice Complex
P.O. Box 970
Trenton, NJ 08625-0970
Finally, the Supreme Court of New Jersey requires a filing fee for registration of out-of-state attorneys. For more information on fees, forms, and other information, you should contact the New Jersey Supreme Court by sending an email to supremect.mailbox@judiciary.state.nj.us or by calling (609) 984-4371.
FINRA Dispute Resolution Service Requirements
Arbitration
If the out-of-state attorney represents the claimant, the claimant must file proof of compliance with RPC 5.5 along with other documents, as required under Rule 10314(a) of the Code of Arbitration Procedure (Code). The Director of Arbitration (Director) will serve promptly on the respondents the proof of compliance along with other documents, as required under Rule 10314(a).
If the out-of-state attorney represents the respondent, the respondent must file proof of compliance with RPC 5.5 along with other documents, as required under Rule 10314(b) of the Code. The respondent must serve each party and the Director with a copy of the proof of compliance as well as other documents, as required under Rule 10314(b).
Mediation
If the out-of-state attorney represents a party in mediation, the out-of-state attorney must provide proof of compliance with RPC 5.5 at the outset of a mediation.
Determination of Location of FINRA Dispute Resolution Proceedings
How Guidelines Affect FINRA Dispute Resolution Administration of Arbitration Proceedings
1 Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, Opinion 43 (Supplementing Opinion 28), January 2007 (visited March 13, 2007).
2 Id.
3 Id. at p. 3.