2009 Dispute Resolution Rule Filings
| SR-FINRA-2009-075 | Proposed Amendments to Postponement Fee Rule and Hearing Session Fee Rule under the Arbitration Codes | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-073 | Proposed Rule Change to Amend Rules 12213 and 13213 of the Customer and Industry Codes to Expand the Criteria for Selecting a Hearing Location for an Arbitration Proceeding | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-072 | Proposed Rule Changes to Amend Rules 12307 and 13307 of the Customer and Industry Codes to Clarify the Date of Filing of an Arbitration Claim Once a Deficiency is Corrected | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-041 | Proposed Rule Change to Amend the Definition of "Associated Person," Streamline a Case Administration Procedure, and Clarify that Customers Could be Assessed Hearing Fees Based on Their Own Claims for Relief in Connection with an Industry Claim | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-026 | Proposal to Amend Various Rules of the Customer Code and Industry Code to Correct Typographical Errors and Implement Other Non-Substantive Technical Changes | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-015 | Proposed Rule Change to Adopt Rule 13806 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes to Establish Procedures to Expedite the Administration of Promissory Note Cases | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-013 | Proposed Rule Change to Amend Rules 12206 and 13206 of the Customer and Industry Codes | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-011 | Proposed Rule Change to Amend the Industry Code to Change the Criteria for Determining the Panel Composition When the Claim Involves an Associated Person in Industry Disputes | |
| SR-FINRA-2009-003 | Proposed Rule Change to Amend the Customer and Industry Codes |