NASD Notice to Members 02-53 - August 2002

NASD Files Proposal to Amend Rule 3070 to Require Filing of Criminal and Civil Complaints and Arbitration Claims with NASD; Revises Letters Sent When Determination Made to Close an Investigation Without Further Action

Executive Summary

NASD has undertaken two initiatives to improve the quality and flow of information to it about allegations of broker misconduct. First, on August 14, 2002, NASD filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a rule proposal to amend NASD Rule 3070 to require members promptly to file with NASD copies of certain criminal and civil complaints and arbitration claims that name a member or an associated person as defendant or respondent. Specifically, the proposed rule change would require members to file with NASD copies of (1) any criminal complaints filed against the member or plea agreements entered into by the member that are covered by the rule; (2) any securities or commodities-related private civil complaints filed against the member; (3) any arbitration claim against the member; and (4) any criminal complaint or plea agreement, private civil complaint or arbitration claim against an associated person that is reportable under Question 14 on Form U-4, irrespective of any dollar threshold requirements that question imposes for notification. Members would not be required to file copies of any arbitration claims filed in the NASD Dispute Resolution forum. NASD recently began to review copies of claims filed in that forum for possible regulatory response.

 

Second, NASD has revised the letters it sends to customers and members when a determination is made to close an investigation without disciplinary action. The revised letters state that a determination by NASD not to take action against a member or a member's associated person has no evidentiary weight in any mediation, arbitration, or judicial proceeding. Further, NASD considers it inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade (Rule 2110) for a member or a member's associated person to attempt to introduce such a determination into evidence in any of those proceedings.

 

Questions concerning this Notice should be directed to Philip Shaikun, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Regulatory Policy and Oversight, at (202) 728-8451.