Notice to Members 04-83

NASD Requests Comment on Whether to Propose New Rule That Would Address Conflicts of Interest When Members Provide Fairness Opinions in Corporate Control Transactions

Comment Period Expired January 10, 2005
Note: The comment period was extended to February 1, 2005.

NASD is requesting comment on whether it should propose a new rule that would address procedures, disclosure requirements, and conflicts of interest when members provide fairness opinions in corporate control transactions. A fairness opinion addresses the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration involved in a transaction. Investment banks typically provide fairness opinions in corporate control transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, the disposition or divestiture of material assets, divisions or subsidiaries, and buybacks of outstanding securities (“transactions”). The scope of the investment bank’s involvement typically is set out in an engagement letter between the bank and the company.

Investment banks that render fairness opinions may be influenced by whether the company's management supports the transaction. In other words, the investment bank may find that the transaction is fair from a financial viewpoint if the transaction is favored by the company's management, and, alternatively, opine that the financial terms are not fair if management opposes the transaction. This conflict may be especially strong when a transaction that is supported by management is also one in which the investment bank acted as the financial advisor to the company in recommending or structuring the transaction and/or where the investment bank will receive financial advisory fees upon successful completion of the transaction.

NASD is considering whether to propose a new rule that would require members to:
(1) disclose in any fairness opinion appearing in any proxy statement any significant conflicts of interest, including, if applicable, that the member has served as an advisor on the transaction in question, and the nature of compensation that the member will receive upon the successful completion of the transaction; and (2) require specific procedures that members must follow to identify and disclose potential conflicts of interest in rendering fairness opinions.

Questions concerning this Notice should be directed to Joseph E. Price, Vice President, Corporate Financing, at (240) 386-4623; or Gary L. Goldsholle, Associate Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Regulatory Policy and Oversight, at (202) 728-8104

The views, expressions, findings and opinions expressed in the comments on this Web page are solely those of the author(s) and FINRA accepts no responsibility for the content of the comments: 
DateCommenterFormat - Size
12/21/2004Charles M. Elson, Arthur H. Rosenbloom, Drew G.L. ChapmanPDF - 22.87 KB
12/9/2004Ohio Retirement SystemsPDF - 154.08 KB
11/30/2004Ohio Public Employees Retirement SystemPDF - 88.77 KB
1/7/2005The Canandian Institute of Chartered Business ValuatorsPDF - 66.78 KB
1/13/2005American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial OrganizationsPDF - 142.13 KB
1/14/2005Kane & Company, Inc.PDF - 58.93 KB
1/18/2005Standard & Poor'sPDF - 225.71 KB
1/14/2005Council of Institutional InvestorsPDF - 45.88 KB
11/24/2004Lerner College of Business and EconomicsPDF - 28.72 KB
2/1/2005Sutter Securities IncorporatedPDF - 70.43 KB
1/31/2005Signal Hill CapitalPDF - 464.32 KB
1/27/2005New York State Bar AssociationPDF - 616.83 KB
1/31/2005Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPPDF - 110.77 KB
1/31/2005HFBE Capital, L.P.PDF - 163.29 KB
2/1/2005The Association of the Bar of the City of New YorkPDF - 67.5 KB
2/1/2005Dewey Ballantine LLPPDF - 274.01 KB
2/1/2005Securities Industry AssociationPDF - 102.88 KB
2/1/2005Houlihan Lokey Howard & ZukinPDF - 67.61 KB
2/1/2005CalPERSPDF - 31.53 KB
1/31/2005Davis Polk & WardwellPDF - 64.31 KB