Skip to main content

Adjudications & Decisions

When FINRA determines that violations of securities rules have occurred and formal disciplinary action is necessary, the Enforcement Department files a complaint with the Office of Hearing Officers (OHO).

The Office arranges a three-person panel to hear the case. The panel is chaired by a hearing officer who is an employee of the Office of Hearing Officers. The Chief Hearing Officer appoints two industry panelists, drawn primarily from a pool of current and former securities industry members of FINRA's District Committees, as well as its Market Regulation Committee, former members of FINRA's National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) and former FINRA Governors.

At the hearing, the parties present evidence for the panel to determine whether a firm or individual has engaged in conduct that violates FINRA rules, SEC regulations or federal securities laws. In reaching its decision, the hearing panel also considers previous court, SEC, and NAC decisions to determine if violations occurred. The NAC is the national committee which reviews initial decisions rendered in FINRA disciplinary and membership proceedings.

For each case, the hearing panel will issue a written decision explaining the reasons for its ruling and consult the FINRA Sanction Guidelines to determine the appropriate sanctions if violations have occurred. FINRA also, when feasible and appropriate, can order firms and individuals to make restitution to harmed customers.


Appeals Process

Under FINRA's disciplinary procedures, a firm or individual has the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC, or the NAC may on its own initiate a review of a decision. On appeal, the NAC will determine if a hearing panel's findings were legally correct, factually supported and consistent with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines. While a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction is not enforced against the firm or individual.

Unless FINRA's Board of Governors decides to review the NAC's appellate decision, that decision represents FINRA's final action. A firm or individual can appeal FINRA's decision to the SEC and then to federal court.


View All Adjudications & Decisions

Choose Year
Date of Decision Proceeding No. Title Type
December 15, 1998 CAF980014 Order and Decision Granting Department of Enforcement's Motion for Summary Disposition in Department of Enforcement v. Michael Ploshnick Disciplinary Decision
December 15, 1998 C9A980021 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Robert J. Kendzierski

Related Documents

Disciplinary Decision
December 14, 1998 C10980041 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Harold Lee Jenkins Disciplinary Decision
December 11, 1998 ARB980009 Non-Summary Suspension Proceeding ARB980009 Expedited Decision, Non-Summary Proceeding
December 02, 1998 C06980021 Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Respondent's Motion to Stay Default Decision, for an Extension of Time to File Answer, and for Extension of Time to Comply with Request for Information Disciplinary Order
December 02, 1998 C8A980012 Department of Enforcement, Complainant v. Respondent Redacted Decision
December 01, 1998 C10980025 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Kory E. Guglielminetti Disciplinary Decision
November 24, 1998 C06980015 Order and Decision Granting Enforcement's Motion for Summary Disposition in Department of Enforcement v. Terry Don Rader Disciplinary Decision
November 18, 1998 C01960020 Daniel Wright Sisson Disciplinary Decision
November 17, 1998 C02980025 Order and Decision Granting Enforcement's Motion for Summary Disposition in Department of Enforcement v. Roger Harry Chlowitz

Related Documents

Disciplinary Decision
November 13, 1998 C02960024 James Basil Peters Disciplinary Decision
November 11, 1998 C8A960094 Norman M. Merz Disciplinary Decision
November 03, 1998 C05930020 Donald R. Gates Disciplinary Decision
October 29, 1998 C3B980006 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Carlton Case Ellis Disciplinary Decision
October 26, 1998 C3A980027 Order Granting Complainant's Motion for Leave to Offer Telephone Testimony Disciplinary Order
October 23, 1998 C06980015 Order Denying Motion to Stay Proceeding Disciplinary Order
October 22, 1998 C9A960029 Pamela A. Hartsock Disciplinary Decision
October 22, 1998 C9A960029 In the Matter of District Business Conduct Committee For District No. 9, Complainant, vs. Respondent 1 Disciplinary Decision, Redacted Decision
October 22, 1998 C8A970040 Herbert L. Davis, Jr. Disciplinary Decision
October 22, 1998 C07960105 Wayne B. Vaughan Disciplinary Decision
October 22, 1998 C8A960081 In the Matter of District Business Conduct Committee For District No. 8, Complainant, vs. Respondent Firm 1 and Respondent 2 Disciplinary Decision, Redacted Decision
October 20, 1998 C10970176 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Robert FitzPatrick

Related Documents

Disciplinary Decision
October 15, 1998 C07970006 Joseph G. Chiulli Disciplinary Decision
October 14, 1998 CMS920005 John Roger Faherty & Nianne A. Norris Disciplinary Decision
October 13, 1998 C8A960052 In the Matter of District Business Conduct Committee For District No. 8, Complainant, vs. Respondent 1 and Respondent 2 Disciplinary Decision, Redacted Decision