NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. In the Matter of Arbitration Between James Lafratta Mark Jozefowski Maureen Harrison Mary Harrison Michael Sullivan Sergio Derojas Mark Marshall Claimants vs. Brooks, Weinger, Robbins & Leeds, Inc, Carol Martino Respondents CASE'S # 88-02977 88-02978 88-02979 88-02980 88-02981 88-02982 88-02983 CASE SUMMARY The Claimants alleged that Respondents fa

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. In the Matter of Arbitration Between James Lafratta Mark Jozefowski Maureen Harrison Mary Harrison Michael Sullivan Sergio Derojas Mark Marshall Claimants vs. Brooks, Weinger, Robbins & Leeds, Inc, Carol Martino Respondents CASE'S # 88-02977 88-02978 88-02979 88-02980 88-02981 88-02982 88-02983 CASE SUMMARY The Claimants alleged that Respondents fa

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. In the Matter of Arbitration Between James Lafratta Mark Jozefowski Maureen Harrison Mary Harrison Michael Sullivan Sergio Derojas Mark Marshall Claimants vs. Brooks, Weinger, Robbins & Leeds, Inc, Carol Martino Respondents CASE'S # 88-02977 88-02978 88-02979 88-02980 88-02981 88-02982 88-02983 CASE SUMMARY The Claimants alleged that Respondents fa

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. In the Matter of Arbitration Between James Lafratta Mark Jozefowski Maureen Harrison Mary Harrison Michael Sullivan Sergio Derojas Mark Marshall Claimants vs. Brooks, Weinger, Robbins & Leeds, Inc, Carol Martino Respondents CASE'S # 88-02977 88-02978 88-02979 88-02980 88-02981 88-02982 88-02983 CASE SUMMARY The Claimants alleged that Respondents fa

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC. In the Matter of Arbitration Between James Lafratta Mark Jozefowski Maureen Harrison Mary Harrison Michael Sullivan Sergio Derojas Mark Marshall Claimants vs. Brooks, Weinger, Robbins & Leeds, Inc, Carol Martino Respondents CASE'S # 88-02977 88-02978 88-02979 88-02980 88-02981 88-02982 88-02983 CASE SUMMARY The Claimants alleged that Respondents fa

9ioic3o6 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Thomas L. McNeely, M.D. Claimant(s) vs. E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc. Respondent(s) AWARD 88-02897 The Arbitrator, David Schwartz, Esq., selected to review and determine a matter in controversy between the above-mentioned Claimant and Respondents, set forth in a submission to arbitration signed by the Respondent and January 9, 1989; And, that hav

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Debra Mayer and Doris Mayer Claimant(s) vs. Securities Settlement Corp. Respondent(s) AWARD 88-02852 The Arbitrator, Neill Edward Hannon, Esq., selected to review and determine a matter in controversy between the above-mentioned Claimant and Respondents, set forth in a submission to arbitration signed by the parties on July 22, 1988 and November 18, 198

Award NASD Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Lalman Seeram Cust for Sophia Seeram (Claimant) v. Glenn Michael Financial, Inc., Roman Novosiadlyi, Edward Goldner, and Stephen William Siegel (Respondents) Case Number: 02-04432 Hearing Site: New York, New York Nature of the Dispute: Customer vs. Terminated Member and Associated Persons. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES Claimant Lalman Seeram Cust for Sophia Seeram ("Seeram") hereinafter

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Merrill Galenski Claimant(s) vs. David Marion Respondent(s) AWARD 88-02850 The Arbitrator, Neill Edward Hannon, Esq., selected to review and determine a matter in controversy between the above-mentioned Claimant and Respondents,, set forth in a submission to arbitration signed by the parties on August 25, 1988 and November 7, 1988, respectively; And

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Isaac Abraham Claimant(s) vs. Donald A. Johnson Respondent(s) AWARD 88-02847 The Arbitrator, Neill Edward Hannon, Esq. selected to review and determine a matter in controversy between the above-mentioned Claimant and Respondents, set forth in a submission to arbitration signed by the Claimant on September 2, 19 88 and not by the Respondent as required b