Skip to main content

For updates and guidance related to COVID-19 / Coronavirus, click here.

1993-003637-Award-NYSE-19940405.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Louis Klein v Chartos Schwab & Co., Inc. Attorneys: For Claimant(a): Louis Ktoin - New Yori(, NY For Reepondant(e): Rhonda Y. Jones Esq. - San Frandsco, CA Date Filed: 12/22/93 First Scheduled: 04A)S/g4 Case Summary: Claimant alleges that Respondent fimi pemfiittad trades In LTV trades should only have been permitted in his regular account. Product: EQU c

1993-003628-Award-NYSE-19940912.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between K^y NYSE Case: Edward Burger and Guadalupe Chavez v. Otoe Discoum Corporation and Bruce Tanis Attorneys: For Claimant(8): Dan A. Druz Esq. - Pt. Ptoasam, NJ For Respondenl(s): Mark L. Kowalsky Esq. - Btoomftok) Hills, Ml Date Filed: 12/16/93 First Scheduled: O8/15/94 Decided: Case Summary: Claimants, public customers, allege fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, brea

1993-003567-Award-NYSE-19940629.pdf

V New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: chartotte Kay Coffeen v. Mike Berger & Smith Barney Shearson Attorneys: For Ctoimam(s): Patrtoia A. Shub Esq. - Ft. Lauderdato, FL For f?espondenl(s): Madelyn A. Levy Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 11/I8/93 First Scheduled: 04/20/94 Decidec 06/29/94 Case Summary: customer v. Member Firm & Registered Representative - claimam alleges unethtoal and unprofesstonal

1993-003566-Award-NYSE-19940623.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Joseph E. Halck vs. Smith Barney Shearson, inc., Joseph J. Plumeri and Malcolm Rogers, Jr Attorneys: For CtoJnfiant(s): Judith P. Vladeck Esq. - New York, NY For Respondent(s): Stuart M. Bompey Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 11/04/93 First Scheduled: 05/11/94 Decided: oa'23/94 Case Summary: Claimant alleges Respondents breached the agreements made at the time of his

01-04651-Award-NASD-20050831.pdf

Award NASD Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Charles and Elizabeth Ramm, Sandra and Joseph Consentino, and Stephen Consentino (Claimants) v. Joseph Miles and Clearing Services of America (Respondents). Case Number: 01-04651 Hearing Site: New York, New York Nature of the Dispute: Customers v. Member and Associated Person. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES Claimants Charles and Elizabeth Ramm ("The Ramms"), Sandra and Joseph Consentino

1993-003560-Award-NYSE-19940125.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Alicia /Uan v Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Attorneys: For Claimam(s): Alida Alan - New York, NY For Respondefit(s): General Counsel - San Francisco, CA Date Filed: 11/12/93 Case Summary: ciaimam, a customer. First Scheduled: 01/25/94 Decided: 01/25/94 has alleged that respondent failed to timely transfer bonds, preventing her from reinvesting the proceeds.

1993-003556-Award-NYSE-19940617.pdf

Vew York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Gruntal & Company vs. Atsushi Uchida Attorneys: For Clainiiant(s): David R. Rappaport Esq. - New York, NY For Respondem(s): Atsushi Uchida - Brooklyn, NY Date Filed: 11/18/93 First Scheduled: O6/17/94 Decided: 06/17/94 Case Summary: Member Firm vs. Registered Rep (ex-employee) seeking recovery of amounts allegedly due under the terms of a promissory note, for liq

1993-003553-Award-NYSE-19940701.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Larry Dumas v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. d/b/a Merrill Lynch and Company Attorneys: For Claimam(s): Michael W. Hinkto Esq. - Oklahoma City, OK For Respondent(s): Robert L. Wright Esq. - Dallas, TX Date Filed: 11/17/93 First Scheduled: O6/21/94 Decided: 07/01/94 Case Summary: Clalmam broker was employed by Respondem Firm. Claimam previously filed a wr

1993-003549-Award-NYSE-19940407.pdf

y New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between (y NYSE Case: Lucas Antonelli and Genevieve HM. /^tonelli v Fidelity Investments Attorneys: For Claimam(s): Lucas V. Antonelli - France, For Respondem(s): Anne Marie Gillette Esq. - Boston. MA Date Filed: 10/21/93 First Scheduled: Decided: 04/07/94 Case Summary: claimant, a customer, has alkjged that respondent failed to execute a sell order of IBM stock and entered a

1993-003547-Award-NYSE-19940520.pdf

«few York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Grumal & Company vs. BarlMira Guodardi Attorneys: For Clairmnl(s): Eric M. Berman Esq. - MIneoto, NY For Respondant^): Barbara Guocjanli - East Brunswick, NJ Date Filed: 11/17/93 Case Summary: Member Firm vs. First Scheduled: 05i20/94 Customer altoging respondem faitod to make full paymem for Product: OPT Decided: os/20/94 an opttons call trade Marke