Skip to main content

For updates and guidance related to COVID-19 / Coronavirus, click here.

01-04580-Award-NASD-20020517.pdf

Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Judith G. Sheppard, Claimant v. Wachovia Investments, Inc. n/k/a Wachovia Securities, Inc., Respondent Case Number: 01-04580 Hearing Site: Charlotte, North Carolina REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES For Judith G. Sheppard, hereinafter referred to as "Claimant": Daryl L. Williams, Esq., Jeter & Williams, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina. For Wachovia Investments, Inc. n/k/a Wachovia

1994-003938-Award-NYSE-19941026.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Jack Sloane v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. Attorneys: For Clainiant(s): Jack Sloane - Howard Beach, NY For Respondent(s): Edward Larkin Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 05/23/94 First Scheduled: 10/26/94 Decided: 10/26/94 Case Summary: Claimant, a public customer, alleges respondent, a member firm, made misrepresentations regarding the purchase of shares In 'JWP". C

1994-003933-Award-NYSE-19941122.pdf

\. New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between y^ NYSE Case: Robin Savitt v. Tucker Anthony Inc. and Muriel Mutterperl Attorneys: For Claimant(s): PhiNp Rosenberg Esq. - Albany, NY For Respondent(s): Patrk:k J. Howley Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 05/23/94 First Scheduied: 10/26/94 Decided: 11/22/94 Case Summary: claimant, a public customer, alleges respondents, a member firm and registered representative, tran

1994-003932-Award-NYSE-19941109.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Katherine D. Landing v J.C. Bradford & Company Attorneys: For Claimant(s): Mack Sperling Esq. - Greensboro, NC For Respondent(s): Claude O Ramer Esq. - Nashville, TN Date Filed: 05.'10/94 First Scheduled: 11/07/94 Decided: 11/09/94 Case Summary: claimant seeks a declaration that she owes no duty to Respondent in connection with her Trainee Agreement with Respondent.

1994-003922-Award-NYSE-19941021.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between / NYSE Case: James Imperiale v Alex Brown & Sons Attorneys: For Claimant(s): David L Ploshnick Esq. - Metuchen, NJ For Respondent(s): Nancy f'almer Esq. - Baltimore, MD Date Filed: 05/20/94 Case Summary: claimant. First Scheduled: 10/21/94 a former employee, has alleged that respondent wrongfully withheld Product: Decided: 10/21/94 a portnn of his bonus. Mar

1994-003919-Award-NYSE-19941129.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Ronald J. Cloud v Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. and William Fairfield Attorneys: For Clainnnt(s): Ronald J. Ckiud - Rolling MDWS, IL For ftespondent(s): Wendy R. Robinson Esq. - San Francisco, CA Date Filed: 04/28/94 First Scheduled: 11/09/94 Decided: "/•"//^ Case Summary: Customer against member firm and registered representative for failure to execute order, unauth

1994-003917-Award-NYSE-19940926.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between Ly^' NYSE Case: Ahmed F. Habeeb v Prudential Securities and Lazaro Fernandez Attorneys: For Claimant(s): Ahmed F. Habeeb - Rn Piedras, PR For Respondent(s): Michael R. GItekman Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 05/10/94 Case Summary: Claimant, a customer, First Sctieduled: O8/12/94 Decided: 09/26/94 , has alleged that respondent entered unauthorized OEX option tra

1994-003913-Award-NYSE-19941202.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between NYSE Case: Lily Salm V. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc. and Fran Goldstein Attorneys: For Claimant(s): Gerald D. Fischer Esq. - New York, NY For Respondent(s): Ellen Slipp Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 05/06/94 First Sctieduled: 10/05/94 Decided: 12/02/94 Case Summary: claimant, a publk: customer, alleges respondents, a member firm and registered representative, engaged in unsuit

1994-003905-Award-NYSE-19940826.pdf

New York Stock Exchange In the Matter of Arbitration Between / NYSE Case: Carl Francis Straub v. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc. Attorneys: For Claimanl(s): Carl Francis Straub - Morganville, NJ For Re8pondent(8): Douglas C. Wurth Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 05/06/94 First Scheduled: 07/20/94 Decided: 08/26/94 Case Summary: Claimant, a publn customer, alleges respondent, a member firm, engaged in unauthorized trading by purchasing sh

1994-003902-Award-NYSE-19941109.pdf

New York Stock Exchange NYSE In the Matter of Arbitration Between Case: Max Newmark v Smith Barney Shearson Attorneys: For Cialmaiit(s): Max Newmark - Delray Beach. FL For RespondenKs): /\nn Parry Esq. - New York, NY Date Filed: 05/10/94 First Sctieduled: n/n/r.>i Decided: ,,,„,„, 11/9/94 11/9/94 Case Summary: Claimant alleges unsuitable purchase of MendJck Corp, a limited partnership. Product: P-SHIP Market: NYSE Claim Data