Skip to main content

For updates and guidance related to COVID-19 / Coronavirus, click here.

MS91-94-Award-MSRB-19921008.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between HARVEY E. LEHN and JOAN M. LEHN Claimants, v. GENE LANTON, Respondent. ^ : ^ .OCr 9 1992 pz q '- ^ AWARD MS91-94 SCl-035 The Undersigned, pursuant to Section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege, among other things, that they were overcharged by the Respondent, a representative of

MS90-68-Award-MSRB-19910608.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimant, V. VAN KAMPEN MERRITT INC. and JAMES M. KOHUIEYER, Respondents. iJUN 12 1991 r • ^ AWARD MS 90-68 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant, a national bank located in the State of Illinois, contends that Respondents violated various SEC and Exchange rules and Federal law

MS90-67-Award-MSRB-19910917.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimant, V. BOETTCHER & COMPANY, INC., NOW BOETTCHER & COMPANY, A DIVISION OF KEMPER SECURITIES GROUP, INC. and JOHN GIVENS, Respondents. SEP ^3 1991 M C ^ =^ itka Wi S'..^ tjf AWARD MS 90-67 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges that at the end of Apri

01-03352-Award-NASD-20020416.pdf

Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Broadband Capital Management, LLC, (Claimant) vs. Robert Tucker, (Respondent) Case Number: 01-03352 Hearing Site: New York, New York REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES Claimant Broadband Capital Management, hereinafter referred to as "Claimant": Louis H. Miron, Esq., Attorney at Law, Westfield, NJ. Previously represented by: Michael S. Colombo, President/CEO, Street Wide Asset Recovery

MS90-66-Award-MSRB-19910627.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimant, V. MARION BASS SECURITIES CORP. and CHARLES L. KING a/k/a CASEY KING, Respondents. ''-.. :b JUL 1 f99| l " : ^- "^ - > AWARD MS90-66 SCO-039 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY On or about July 27, 1986 Claimant purchased for $81,084.00 through Respo

MS90-65-Award-MSRB-19910923.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between PHIL LITSAS, JR., V. ROY SMITH and PAUL ROSENBLOOM, Claimant, Respondents. AWARD MS90-65 SCO-038 The Undersigned, pursuant to Section 31 of MSRB Rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY/RELIEF REQUESTED Claimant alleges that at the end of October or the beginning of November, 1989, one or both of the Respondents contacted Claimant with an

MS90-61-Award-MSRB-19910417.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD /^ APR £2 1991 In the Matter of the Arbitration between CARL RAVENS and LILLIAN RAVENS, Claimants, V. MUNICIPAL INVESTORS SERVICE, INC., Respondent. f- • I' AWARD MS90-61 SCO-035 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY/RELIEF REQUESTED On April 23, 1987, for settlement April 30, 1987, Claimants purchased from Respon

MS90-59-Award-MSRB-19910705.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between MARGARET C. ROCK, v. Claimant, A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC. Respondent. JUL 9 199, AWARD MS90-59 SCO-034 The Undersigned, pursuant to Section 31 of MSRB Rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges that certain municipal bonds declined in value shortly after the time of Claimant's purchase of the bonds from Respondent and bas

MS90-58-Award-MSRB-19911111.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimants, v. ERWIN ALLEN FORGES and GRUNTAL & CO,. INC. Respondents. ^ - ^ .. fi NOV r- 18 AWARD MS 90- • 1 . 1 / . 58 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege, among other things, that Respondent Gruntal & Co., Inc. ("Responden

MS90-56-Award-MSRB-19910328.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Natter of the Arbitration between Claimant, V. SAMUEL A. RAMIREZ & CO., INC. AND THOMAS PERROTTA Respondents. AWARD MS90-56 SCO-033 The undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY In the above-captioned arbitration. Claimant alleges that on March 30, 1990, Respondent Thomas Perrotta ("Respondent Perrotta"), a representative of Respo