Skip to main content

For updates and guidance related to COVID-19 / Coronavirus, click here.

MS89-106-Award-MSRB-19900816.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD mj8 20 1990 In the Matter V. of the Arbitrat MICHAEL STEIN; DAVID LINDNER KIRLIN SECURITIES, INC., ion between Claimants, : and Respondents. AWARD MS 89-106 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege that Respondent Michael Stein, while he was employed at A.F. Green & Co. and later with Respondent Kiriin Se

MS89-105-Award-MSRB-19900729.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between v. HALPERT AND COMPANY, INC., Claimant, Respondent. Mlb (^\)G 3 1990 AWARD MS 89-105 SC9-039 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges that Reap December, 1988, to sell $25,000 Pu purchase $25,000 New York State En that Respondent told him that it w to complete the

MS89-104-Award-MSRB-19900817.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between v. STEPHEN E. SHOGREN, Claimant, Respondent, mib AUG 21 1990 f«i AWARD MS 89-104 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges numerous material misrepresentations by Respondent Stephen E. Shogren, formerly President of now defunct United Securities, Inc., Wichita, Kansas, con

MS89-103-Award-MSRB-19900803.pdf

i:: 6 iwo MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD n* •! i'-v L:* O a   - - • _ •» In the Matter of the Arbitration between ARTHUR PFIRMAN and CONSTANCE PFIRMAN, Claimants, V. J.C. BRADFORD & CO. and PAUL JAGACINSKI, Respondents. AWARD MS 89-103 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege that Respondents J.C. Bradfo

MS89-102-Award-MSRB-19900820.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD 6" 1 •-.. Ain r In the Matter of the BRYAN A. DAWBER TRUST FBO BRYAN A. DAWBER, V. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS Arbit UAD UPHAN ration b 2/12/76 CI & CO., Reap etween aimant, INC., ondent. Wi. AWARD MS 89-102 SC9-041 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges that Re

MS89-100-Award-MSRB-19901029.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Natter of the RAY THOLEN, ROBBRT ROBERT JOHN D V. M. BUCHANAN, C. FAIRLY, JR . CRAWFORD, Arhitrat JR.; . and ion Re between Claimant, spondents. OCT 81 )99o AWARD MS 89-100 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges, among other things, fraud and suitability claims aga

MS89-98-Award-MSRB-19900320.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration Between MERTON EPHRAIM, V. Clainant, SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC. and WILLIAM BERG, Respondents. AWARD MS89-98 SC9-038 The undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule 6-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleged that there was a vast disparity between the actual value of certain municipal securities purchased by Claimant from Responde

MS89-97-Award-MSRB-19900621.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULE'i^AKlNG BOARD p--'-b i}\i]i 23 1990 r*: r« "•-. -^ In the Matter of the Arbitration between ROBERT BYRO and BEATRICE BYRD, Claimants, V. GATEWAY SECURITIES, INC. and DAVID WESTON, Respondents. AWARD MS 89-97 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege, among other things, that Respondent David Weston (**Weston"), re

MS89-92-Award-MSRB-19900214.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD < m(b FEB 21 1990 In the Matter THORN, v. ALVIS, Of the WELCH, Arbitration INC., Between : Claimant, : Respondent. : AWARD MS89-92 SC9-036 The UNDERSIGNED, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows. CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleged that, despite her request. Respondent failed to fully disclose all the call features regarding certain mun

MS89-90-Award-MSRB-19900605.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Claimants, V. BOETTCHER & COMPANY, INC. and LAURENCE G. ALPERT, Respondents. AWARD MS 89-90 The UNDERSIGNED, pursuant to MSRB Rule G-35, Section 31, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege that Respondent Laurence G. Alpert ("Alpert"), acting within the scope of his employment with Respondent Boettcher & Company, Inc. ("Boettcher"),.made