Skip to main content

For updates and guidance related to COVID-19 / Coronavirus, click here.

MS90-61-Award-MSRB-19910417.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD /^ APR £2 1991 In the Matter of the Arbitration between CARL RAVENS and LILLIAN RAVENS, Claimants, V. MUNICIPAL INVESTORS SERVICE, INC., Respondent. f- • I' AWARD MS90-61 SCO-035 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY/RELIEF REQUESTED On April 23, 1987, for settlement April 30, 1987, Claimants purchased from Respon

MS90-59-Award-MSRB-19910705.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between MARGARET C. ROCK, v. Claimant, A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC. Respondent. JUL 9 199, AWARD MS90-59 SCO-034 The Undersigned, pursuant to Section 31 of MSRB Rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges that certain municipal bonds declined in value shortly after the time of Claimant's purchase of the bonds from Respondent and bas

MS90-58-Award-MSRB-19911111.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimants, v. ERWIN ALLEN FORGES and GRUNTAL & CO,. INC. Respondents. ^ - ^ .. fi NOV r- 18 AWARD MS 90- • 1 . 1 / . 58 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege, among other things, that Respondent Gruntal & Co., Inc. ("Responden

MS90-56-Award-MSRB-19910328.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Natter of the Arbitration between Claimant, V. SAMUEL A. RAMIREZ & CO., INC. AND THOMAS PERROTTA Respondents. AWARD MS90-56 SCO-033 The undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY In the above-captioned arbitration. Claimant alleges that on March 30, 1990, Respondent Thomas Perrotta ("Respondent Perrotta"), a representative of Respo

MS90-48-Award-MSRB-19910607.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD Ji'Nio m\ P c - ^ In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimant, v. MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC. and CHRISTOPHER C. DECKAS, Respondents. AWARD MS90-48 SCO-030 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant alleges that in late 1984 or early 1985, and again in December, 1985, he contacted Respondent Christopher C

MS90-47-Award-MSRB-19910312.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD «Aft .in - 1% 1991 In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claiaants, V. AMERIFIRST SECURITIES CORPORATION Respondent. AWARD MS90-47 SCO-029 The UndersiKned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY/RELIEF REQUESTED Claimants al $50,000 face amount Respondent, Responde knowledge or consent 104 1/2 and subseque due Claima

MS90-46-Award-MSRB-19910506.pdf

16 f99r MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD ^^MB. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimant, v. ROBERT PEELE and MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Respondents. AWARD MS 90-46 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby state as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimant, a national bank located in the State of Illinois, alleges that Robert Peele ("Respondent Peele"), a registered representat

MS90-45-Award-MSRB-19910104.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD •.U .- •..•UN f(;J- J m 3 1991 In the Matt LEO LANGSAM V. LEGG MASON and RAY F. er of 1 HOOD PECK, the Arb WALKER, JR., itrat INC. ion between : Claimant, Respondents. •'•• •' . v% i'ima ^a mii uJt AWARD MS90-45 SC0-02B The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY C

MS90-44-Award-MSRB-19910416.pdf

^ APR 17 1991 MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between FRANK W. KENDRICK AND EDITH M. KENDRICK Claimants, v. CHARLES HURSEY AND MARION BASS SECURITIES, CORP. Respondents, e - -» 'iaWvruf u/a AWARD MS90-44 SCO-027 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY Claimants allege that on August 29, 1989 they received a call fr

MS90-41-Award-MSRB-19910410.pdf

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD In the Matter of the Arbitration between Claimant, V. JERSEY CAPITAL MARKETS GROUP, INC. Respondent. AWARD MS90-41 SCO-026 The Undersigned, pursuant to section 31 of MSRB rule G-35, hereby states as follows: CASE SUMMARY/RELIEF REQUESTED Claimant alleges that on 10-19-89 he instructed Respondent, to deliver certain municipal bonds from his account at Respondent to another broker/dealer for se