PACIFIC EXCHANGE. INC. 301 Pine Street San Francisco, Califomia 94104 In The Matter OfThe Arbitration Between: MAR 2 G 2()i}f spy •.-'-.. ^. > --A r * -:.' • - .- GUS BOOSALIS, BOOSALIS OPTIONS, LP Claimants V. INVESTEC ERNST & COMP.\NY Respondents PCXCASENO.00-S027 DECISION The undersigned Arbitrators, having read and considered the Claim submined by Gus Boosalis and Boosalis Options, LP ('Claimant")

r-.AClFIC EXCHANGE, INC. 301 Pine Street San Francisco, Cahfomia 94104 In Thd Matter OfThe .Arbitration Bcnvecn: M.AKCO .AMBROSELLI and TANYA JANXOVIC. f 'iinia^iis PCX CASE #: 99-S030 DECISION Or.DE :)1SCCIU"NT CORPORA'noX and TOM KEZLHR. Respondents The undersigned .Arbiiraiors. having read and considered die Claim submitted by Marco Ambroselli ("Cbintiani") on Ju.ie ?0,1999, and lhe Answer of OLDE Discount and Tom Fezler ('^Respon

PACIFIC E.\CHANGE. INC. 301 Pine Street San Frarxisco. California 9^104 « « «W-T rw^.. In Ihc Mjtter OfThe .'Xrbitralion Betwieen: ANTIIONT .\PI*ELr,. Claimam. AUG - 3 ZODl PCX CASE NO. 00-S029 ^^y 3. -r..- - ' j / . r-." 1 • • •-•••-• DECISION V. MORG.\N ST.\NLEY I)l-:..\N wnTER &. CC.' and AL.-\N WARTLKY. Responder4ls. The undcrsisrncci Arbitrator, having read and considered the Claim dated December 5,20

PAaFIC EXCHANGE, ENC. lis Sansome Street, 3*^ Fk>or San Francisco, Caliform'a 94104 OCT \ 6 zon -..— '-^f In Tbe Matter OfThe Arbitration Bctv>-ecn PAUL SCHREIBMAN, Claimant, V. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.. Respondem PCX CASE tf01-S008 DEQSION Tbe undersigned Arbitrator, having read and considered the Claim submitted by Claimant on May IS, 2001 and the Answer of Rcqxmdem, hereby renders the fbltowing Deciskm pursuant to Rule

P.^ClFIC EXCILANGE. INC. ,-_.-.. 115 SansomeSircc; ftEViis i .-• San Fra.nc:5co, California 9^104 OCT 1 s 2oei In the Matter of Ae .Arbitrannn Between: ' j ^ " - ' 3JCHARD HYNF.S, PCX CASE NO,: OO-SOll I Claimanr. j DECISION .^.G. HDWARDS& SONS. D.AVTD TRLIMBLEJ .OD NHCHAEL GORTON ! Respondcn:.'.. The undersigned .'Curators, having read ind considered ic Claim submitted bv Richard Hynes I'CIaunanc") on or

PACIFIC EXCHANGE, INC. 115 Sansome Street, 3"* Floor San Francisco, Califomia 94104 "^'-um In The Maner Of The .Arbitration Between: Robert Kvle, CLAIMANT V, D..-\. Davidson & Co., Timothy Owens. .\nd Brenda Hurlcss, RESPONDENTS PCX CASE 01-SOlO DECISION The undersigned Arhiirator, having read and considered the Claim submitted by Robert Kyle ("Claimant'') on June 18.2001; the Answer of D.-A. Davidson &. Co., Timothy Owens, and B

PACMC EXCJiANGE, [NC 115 Sansome Street, J"* Floor San ryancisco. Caiifomia 9^10< t 115 Sansome Street, J"* Floor rlis ^ *": ^ / . NOV 1 3 zottt In Tlie Matter Ot'The Arbitrarion Between: • --^ - . -- Kar>"n Whitham, CLAIMANT PCX CASE 01-L004 DECISION \. Salomon .Smith Barney and Larr/ Kush. RESPONDENTS The undersigned Arbitrator, having reviewed lhe pleadings and c:vidcncc or both Kar^Ti Whitham (**C!aimant") and Salomon

PACffIC EXCOiNGE, INC 115 Ssnsomc Street, 3rd floor San Fraodsco, California 94104 In Tbe Bfirtter of ih« Arbitnitian Between CLMMANT V l.TBS/IfaiMWebber Roger Rowe, Mark Floprer, EricToiver RESW5KDE?TTS PCX Case No. 01-5012 DECISION His andeniensd Axbnr£tor, having lead and ccinsidered ifae Qaim suboiited by Oaiisant on June 30, 2001, and tbe Asawtt of Re^>ondcKts. hes«by loden the following Dedson ptrsoaa to Rules 12.2 and lZJ9

L#3 '•H^- 3 ' J2 11.4j/r !: JfC 42t;):554;^ y ^ '^ M'JFIC EXCHAKGC W( ilSSwsoracSireet ^3(1 l-rancisco.Cah&ffiiU ^'^.A Sicv«n SmiiK. CUimuit PtxrjL5F.>0.:W-I.ft2« D£aS3')N TtiL jmtursi^td ^rtiiiraior;!. ba< in.>. stid and caoxidcrtd ihc K.»*Tn s'lbrr'ncn h^ Chim^iK S:«^v'l Sptitn rCIa< m«iiOon^Jav«nib«i2T.::t)U4.31^ ihe Answer of Fiine'^bbCT. Inc. and Joel Kubijn"hc5p< uiiirmO \la:Kd i cfaiuar* 2. 2001. ha\in^ ^.>fi?ideTed »l! usiimDny givci mi

PACIFIC EXCHANGE, INC. 301 Pine Street San Francisco, California 941104 In The Matter OfThe Arbitration Between: DONALD S. CASON Claimant FIRST UNION SECURITIES, INC. And SCOTT M. DENNISTON Respondents PCX CASE # 00-L023 DECISION The undersigned Arbitrators, having read and considered the Clarm submitted by C)ainr< ant on July 17, 2000 and the Answer cf Respondents, hereby render the 'oliowing Decision pursuant to Rule 12 of the R