Adjudication and Decisions

When FINRA determines that violations of securities rules have occurred and formal disciplinary action is necessary, the Enforcement Department or Market Regulation Department files a complaint with the Office of Hearing Officers (OHO).

The Office arranges a three-person panel to hear the case. The panel is chaired by a hearing officer who is an employee of the Office of Hearing Officers. The Chief Hearing Officer appoints two industry panelists, drawn primarily from a pool of current and former securities industry members of FINRA's District Committees, as well as its Market Regulation Committee, former members of FINRA's National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) and former FINRA Governors.

At the hearing, the parties present evidence for the panel to determine whether a firm or individual has engaged in conduct that violates FINRA rules, SEC regulations or federal securities laws. In reaching its decision, the hearing panel also considers previous court, SEC, and NAC decisions to determine if violations occurred. The NAC is the national committee which reviews initial decisions rendered in FINRA disciplinary and membership proceedings.

For each case, the hearing panel will issue a written decision explaining the reasons for its ruling and consult the FINRA Sanction Guidelines to determine the appropriate sanctions if violations have occurred. FINRA also, when feasible and appropriate, can order firms and individuals to make restitution to harmed customers.

Appeals Process

Under FINRA's disciplinary procedures, a firm or individual has the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC, or the NAC may on its own initiate a review of a decision. On appeal, the NAC will determine if a hearing panel's findings were legally correct, factually supported and consistent with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines. While a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction is not enforced against the firm or individual.

Unless FINRA's Board of Governors decides to review the NAC's appellate decision, that decision represents FINRA's final action. A firm or individual can appeal FINRA's decision to the SEC and then to federal court.

Date of Decision Proceeding No. Titlesort ascending Type
Jul 24, 2017 2012034719701 APPEALED: Paul E. Taboada Disciplinary Decision
Mar 7, 2008 2005002570601 Paul Douglas Paratore Disciplinary Decision
Aug 7, 2015 20090208031-02 Paul Charles Dotson Disciplinary Decision
Dec 14, 2009 2006004377701 Paul Bryan Zenke Disciplinary Decision
Feb 23, 2006 C01040010 Patrick Orvil Nugent Disciplinary Decision
Apr 16, 2015 SD-2054 Patrick Lubin with Dinosaur Securities Statutory Disqualification, Approvals
Mar 27, 2014 SD-1975 Patrick Dukette Statutory Disqualification, Approvals
Jul 18, 2016 2012033351801 Paolo Franca Iida Disciplinary Decision
Apr 28, 2015 2012033351801 CALLED FOR REVIEW: Paolo Franca Iida Disciplinary Decision
Oct 22, 1998 C9A960029 Pamela A. Hartsock Disciplinary Decision
Nov 27, 2002 C01000037 Pacific On-Line Trading & Securities, Inc., & Timothy Alan McAdams Disciplinary Decision
Jan 23, 1998 C3B960004 Otto M. Bruun Disciplinary Decision
Apr 13, 1999 CMS980108 Order with Respect to Respondent's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Disciplinary Order
Mar 9, 2000 C8A990032 Order Vacating Default Against Respondent, Granting Complainant Leave to Re-Serve the Complaint, and Setting a Briefing Schedule on the Issue of Jurisdiction Disciplinary Order
Dec 19, 1997 C10970172 Order to Show Cause Why Respondents Should Not Be Held in Default to Appear at at Pre-Hearing Conference Disciplinary Order
Dec 6, 2007 20070086505-01 Order to Show Cause Disciplinary Order
Jan 15, 1998 C10970163 Order to Show Cause Disciplinary Order
Oct 17, 2012 2010024320101 Order to Provide Verification in Support of Request for Continuance of Hearing Disciplinary Order
Nov 13, 2017 2013035345701 Order Sustaining Department of Enforcement’s Objection to Respondents’ Inclusion of Erin Vocke on their Proposed Witness List Disciplinary Order
Mar 3, 2006 E9B2003033501 Order Sustaining Complainant's Objections to Respondent's Expert Witness Designation and Report Disciplinary Order
Dec 19, 1997 C01970032 Order Striking Answer Filed on Behalf of and Directing the Department of Enforcement to Send a Second Notice of Complaint Disciplinary Order
Feb 2, 1998 C04970029 Order Staying Proceeding Disciplinary Order
Jan 12, 1998 C3A970074 Order Setting Second Pre-Hearing Conference Disciplinary Order
Feb 28, 2007 2005001305701 Order Setting Philadelphia, Pa as Venue for Disciplinary Proceeding Disciplinary Order
Sep 14, 2006 DFC060004 Order Setting a Pre-Hearing Conference Disciplinary Order

Pages