Stavis Wealth Transfer Solutions Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-05
Dear Ms. Mitchell,
I am the owner of a Registered Investment Advisory firm in Houston, Texas, with five employees and a registered representative of an unaffiliated FINRA member firm.
My position is that rule 3290 in regulatory notice 25–05 would duplicate oversight, and the inefficiency is likely to create unnecessary complexity for RAA’s, unaffiliated Broker Dealers, and most importantly, valued clients.
2021072231801 Webull Financial LLC CRD 289063 AWC vr (2025-1749342003744).pdf
2018056490325 Nicholas J. Schiano CRD 4429212 AWC vr (2025-1749342003685).pdf
2018056490329 Joseph L. Tranchina CRD 6085344 AWC lp (2025-1749342003702).pdf
Janice Parise Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-05
Rule 17a-5 requires all member firms to file Schedule 1 of Form X-17A-5. This Schedule is a calendar year--end report filed by all registrants as a supplement to the regular fourth quarter FOCUS report. Schedule 1 requires the reporting of general information designed to measure certain economic and financial characteristics of the registrant. I believe this form is redundant, requesting information that is already available on the Firm’s FINRA Gateway Profile (# of RRs, # of branches), FOCUS report, and Form Custody. I think Schedule 1 should be eliminated as a requirem