Skip to main content

Jay Aichelman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

CommenPlease don't limit retail usage of Leveraged and Inverse ETFs. They're actually easier to use than options/derivatives, and are incredibly useful tools for any active trader. You should not be limiting the average American's ability to build wealth in any way, as long as it doesn't cause harm to anyone else. Both of the brokerages I use have warnings for Leveraged and Inverse ETFs, and they also ask you questions about your trading experience when you first sign up and limit your access to things like options/derivatives and margin until you take their survey and are approved.

Andres De Jesus Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I would like to make my point why this regulation does not benefit or protect consumers the way FINRA might think:

Leveraged ETF's:

Getting a loan for a mortgage by putting % as down payment is also a leveraged product, not complex at all, are you going to regulate that too? Should people read or pass a test to buy a house? Even more, this is all my MY MONEY not the banks', let me invest it as I see fit.

Volatility funds:

Mitchell Skiba Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Comments:I have traded L&I ETFs in the past. My broker's website asked me to first declare intentions for my account that were consistent with L&I products (short term and actively monitored.) I feel this was more than sufficient to dissuade any uninformed investor that didn't know what they were getting into. I don't want to be "protected" from these funds. I want to be able to continue to make informed investment decisions.