Skip to main content

Aleksandr Golodner Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly believe in freedom of trading/investing. There is not much knowledge to have about inverse and other complex ETFs...I dont know how regulators can think this poses risk to public. What poses the risk is limitation of choices for investors. The less choice, the less opportunity to hedge and more losses as a result. For this reason, i ask regulators not to enact this regulation. Thank you very much for your attention.

Douglas Liebhafsky Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Inverse and leveraged ETFs are a valuable investing tool. They are already subject to the normal securities-disclosure requirements, and to burden them with further restrictions would run counter to the fundamental premises of our securities laws. So long as disclosure requirements are met, there should be no impediment to investing -- investors should be free to decide for themselves on the merits of these securities.

Derek Wiesner Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The leveraged and inverse funds in question are very important in my personal investing strategy while I am in retirement. I do not need regulators or the federal government to require my personal knowledge of situation.

Please maintain my access and use to these funds without change.

I am a tax paying, voting, citizen. Personal accountability is a fundamental freedom and requirement of the citizens of the United States.

Thank you.