Skip to main content

Timothy Githens Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-05

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Regulatory Notice 25-05. While I support efforts to streamline oversight, I oppose the proposed consolidation of Rules 3270 and 3280 in their current form.

The definition of "investment-related activities" is overly broad and risks encompassing low-risk or personal activities that do not warrant regulatory scrutiny. This may overwhelm firms with unnecessary reporting while distracting from truly material conflicts.

Alberto Sosa Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-05

I am writing to express my strong opposition to FINRA’s Proposed Rule 3290 as outlined in Regulatory Notice 25-05. As a responsible investor who personally owns digital assets and utilizes a registered advisor through Digital Wealth Partners, I am deeply concerned about the proposed restrictions requiring financial advisors to seek written approval from their broker/dealer before engaging in personal crypto asset investments.

Denny Betz Comment On Regulatory Notice 25-05

FINRA Regulatory Notice 25-05 and Proposed Rule 3290 - I'm writing to strenuously object to the adoption of this rule as being oppressive and a major step back in the bureau's efforts to be more pro-business and progressive. I deal with several advisers that would be negatively impacted by the adoption of 3290. This would cause them to leave their firms as I don't believe they would sell their holdings, I know I wouldn't and don't want them to. I'm not eager to find new advisors either.