Skip to main content

Adjudications & Decisions

When FINRA determines that violations of securities rules have occurred and formal disciplinary action is necessary, the Enforcement Department files a complaint with the Office of Hearing Officers (OHO).

The Office arranges a three-person panel to hear the case. The panel is chaired by a hearing officer who is an employee of the Office of Hearing Officers. The Chief Hearing Officer appoints two industry panelists, drawn primarily from a pool of current and former securities industry members of FINRA's District Committees, as well as its Market Regulation Committee, former members of FINRA's National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) and former FINRA Governors.

At the hearing, the parties present evidence for the panel to determine whether a firm or individual has engaged in conduct that violates FINRA rules, SEC regulations or federal securities laws. In reaching its decision, the hearing panel also considers previous court, SEC, and NAC decisions to determine if violations occurred. The NAC is the national committee which reviews initial decisions rendered in FINRA disciplinary and membership proceedings.

For each case, the hearing panel will issue a written decision explaining the reasons for its ruling and consult the FINRA Sanction Guidelines to determine the appropriate sanctions if violations have occurred. FINRA also, when feasible and appropriate, can order firms and individuals to make restitution to harmed customers.


Appeals Process

Under FINRA's disciplinary procedures, a firm or individual has the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC, or the NAC may on its own initiate a review of a decision. On appeal, the NAC will determine if a hearing panel's findings were legally correct, factually supported and consistent with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines. While a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction is not enforced against the firm or individual.

Unless FINRA's Board of Governors decides to review the NAC's appellate decision, that decision represents FINRA's final action. A firm or individual can appeal FINRA's decision to the SEC and then to federal court.


View All Adjudications & Decisions

Choose Year
Date of Decision Proceeding No. Title Type
March 30, 1999 C02960039 Harry Gliksman & William Gallagher Disciplinary Decision
March 30, 1999 C01970021 Robin Bruce McNabb Disciplinary Decision
March 28, 1999 ARB980029 Non-Summary Suspension Proceeding ARB980029 Expedited Decision, Non-Summary Proceeding
March 22, 1999 C02980073 Order Granting Enforcement's Motion for Leave to Introduce Expert Witness Testimony Disciplinary Order
March 14, 1999 CAF980086 Hearing Panel Decision Redacted Decision
March 14, 1999 CAF980025 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Richard Stephen Levitov; Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Ralph Joseph Angeline

Related Documents

Disciplinary Decision
February 17, 1999 CAF970002 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Robert J. Rosato Disciplinary Decision
February 09, 1999 C06950029 Frank J. Ingersoll Disciplinary Decision
February 08, 1999 CAF980002 Order Denying Motion to Disqualify a Panelist Disciplinary Order
February 05, 1999 C02960001 Harold B. Gallison, Jr., Gregory K. Mehlmann, Robert C. Weaver, Gerald R. Budke, Christopher S. Knight, La Jolla Capital Corporation Disciplinary Decision
February 05, 1999 C8B980018 Kellie A. Will Disciplinary Decision
February 01, 1999 ARB980019 Non-Summary Suspension Proceeding ARB980019 Expedited Decision, Non-Summary Proceeding
January 28, 1999 C9A970018 Maximo J. Guevara Disciplinary Decision
January 27, 1999 C10960168 In the Matter of District Business Conduct Committee For District No. 10 Complainant, vs. Respondent Firm 1, Respondent 2, and Respondent 3 Disciplinary Decision, Redacted Decision
January 27, 1999 C04980035 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Robert Lee Davis, Jr. Disciplinary Decision
January 26, 1999 C3A970026 In the Matter of District Business Conduct Committee For District No. 3 Complainant, vs. Respondent 1 Disciplinary Decision, Redacted Decision
January 22, 1999 C8A960063 Keith L. Mohn Disciplinary Decision
January 21, 1999 C3B960026 Gerald Cash McNeil Disciplinary Decision
January 20, 1999 C9A980020 Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Sturdivant & Company, Inc., Harvey R. deKrafft, and Albert A. Sturdivant Disciplinary Decision
January 20, 1999 C10960047 Jawahar K. Doshi Disciplinary Decision
January 13, 1999 C9B960032 Brian D. Angiuli Disciplinary Decision
January 13, 1999 C10970003 Donald Clyde Bozzi Disciplinary Decision
January 13, 1999 C8A970070 Theodore L. Pittman, III Disciplinary Decision
January 06, 1999 CAF980002 Order Denying "Notice of Objection to Order" and Rejecting "Response to Order to Show Cause" of Respondents Disciplinary Order
January 01, 1999 SD99026 In the Matter of the Association of X Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Denials