FINRA Requests Comment on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of its Communications With the Public Rules
The comment period has been extended to May 23, 2014.
* The comment period has been extended to May 23, 2014.
Retrospective Rule Review
Regulatory Notice | |
Notice Type Request for Comment |
Suggested Routing Advertising Compliance Investment Companies Registered Representatives Research Senior Management |
Key Topics Communications With the Public Correspondence Institutional Communications Retail Communications |
Referenced Rules & Notices FINRA Rule 2210 FINRA Rule 2212 FINRA Rule 2213 FINRA Rule 2214 FINRA Rule 2215 FINRA Rule 2216 |
Executive Summary
FINRA is conducting a retrospective review of several communications with the public rules to assess their effectiveness and efficiency. This Notice outlines the general retrospective rule review process and seeks responses to several questions related to firms' experiences with these specific rules.
Questions regarding this Notice should be directed to:
Action Requested
FINRA encourages all interested parties to comment. Comments must be received by May 8, 2014.
Comments must be submitted through one of the following methods:
Marcia E. Asquith
Office of the Corporate Secretary
FINRA
1735 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1506
To help FINRA process comments more efficiently, persons should use only one method to comment.
Important Notes: All comments received in response to this Notice will be made available to the public on the FINRA website. In general, FINRA will post comments as they are received.1
Background & Discussion
FINRA believes that it is appropriate, after a reasonable period of time, to look back at its significant rulemaking to determine whether a FINRA rule or rule set3 is meeting its intended investor-protection objectives by reasonably efficient means. FINRA further believes that a retrospective review should include a review not only of the substance and application of a rule or rule set, but also FINRA's processes to administer the rules. FINRA intends to select relevant rules and to conduct retrospective rule reviews on an ongoing basis to ensure that its rules remain relevant and appropriately designed to achieve their objectives, particularly in light of environmental, industry and market changes.
FINRA will prioritize rules for review, taking into consideration a number of factors, including:
For a newly adopted rule, FINRA will consider it for retrospective review after a reasonable implementation period—allowing FINRA time to gain experience with the rule and to obtain meaningful data to conduct a thorough assessment of the rule's impact.
The review process will consist of two phases: (1) findings and (2) action. During the findings phase, FINRA will assess the efficacy and efficiency of the rule or rule set as currently implemented, including FINRA's internal administrative processes. FINRA also intends to seek input from affected parties and experts, including its advisory committees, subject-matter experts inside and outside of the organization, and other stakeholders, including industry members, investors, interested groups and the public. FINRA staff will assess issues including: the existence of duplicative, inconsistent or ineffective regulatory obligations; whether market or other conditions have changed to suggest there are ways to improve the efficiency or effectiveness of a regulatory obligation without loss of investor protections; and potential gaps in the regulatory framework. Upon completion of this assessment, FINRA staff will report its findings to the Board of Governors and make a general staff recommendation as to whether the rule or rule set should be maintained as is, modified or deleted. The staff will also recommend an action plan that will, where appropriate, include recommendations as to how a rule or rule set should be modified, or the need for additional research or information gathering. However, FINRA does not intend the findings phase to produce a specific proposal to modify any rules.
The action phase will then follow. If the findings report recommends modification of rules, FINRA will separately engage in its usual rulemaking process to propose amendments to the rules based on the findings. This process will include input from FINRA's advisory committees and an opportunity for comment on specific proposed revisions in a Regulatory Notice or rule filing with the SEC, or both.
Request for Comment
FINRA has identified the communications with the public rule set for review. This rule set includes the following rules:
FINRA seeks answers to the following questions with respect to this rule set:
In addition to comments responsive to these questions, FINRA requests any data or evidence in support of comments. While FINRA welcomes specific suggestions as to how the rules should be changed, the purpose of this Notice is to obtain input as to whether or not the current rule set is effective and efficient. As discussed above, FINRA will separately consider during the action phase specific changes to the rules.
1 FINRA will not edit personal identifying information, such as names or email addresses, from submissions. Persons should submit only information that they wish to make publicly available. See NTM 03-73 (November 2003) (Online Availability of Comments) for more information.
2 A rule set is a group of rules identified by FINRA staff to contain similar subject, characteristics or objectives.
Date | Commenter |
---|---|
Great American Advisors, Inc. Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Financial Services Roundtable Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
SIFMA Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
PIABA Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
K&L Gates LLP Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
NPB Financial Group, LLC Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Smith T. Rowe Price Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Vanguard Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Investment Company Institute Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Financial Services Institute Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
Fidelity Investments Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 | |
IPA Comments on Regulatory Notice 14-14 |