Why should only the large investor get the right to protect their investments during a downturn in the market, which they probably controlled and then not allow the small investor to equally protect their investment when the market goes down, something they probably had nothing to do with the downturn. The playing field should be the same for all investors, not just a small percentage of very wealthy investors. The large investor forces the market down and why should the small investor bears the entire brunt of the downturn while the wealthy investor makes a large profit via inverse funds. Makes zero sense to me David Bichler small investor
David Bichler Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
Why should only the large investor get the right to protect their investments during a downturn in the market, which they probably controlled and then not allow the small investor to equally protect their investment when the market goes down, something they probably had nothing to do with the downturn. The playing field should be the same for all investors, not just a small percentage of very wealthy investors. The large investor forces the market down and why should the small investor bears the entire brunt of the downturn while the wealthy investor makes a large profit via inverse funds. Makes zero sense to me David Bichler small investor