This is severely troublesome. I, Brent Rusinoski rely on free trading including inverse stocks because I actually invest hundreds of hours of research and willing to lose everything so I can potentially make a profit. Who are you to tell me I can or cannot do such a thing.
I am in favor of these proposed rule changes. Specifically the disclosing of synthetic positions. It is vital that this information be made available to combat predatory trading practices. Practices that artificially destroy businesses and lives. If we cannot eliminate the loophole that allows for synthetic naked shorting, getting as much information made public is the next best thing. Perhaps it
The premise of having public securities is the amount of available information to make an intelligent and informed decision. Leveraged ETFs come with enough information. There are stocks from other countries listed that do not adhere to standard accounting practices or disclosures. Why target Leveraged ETFs and not the other investments?
This is absolutely ridiculous.PDT rules create undo burden and increase the level of risk and loss associated with trading. Having a required $25,000 minimum was an already ridiculous standard, increasing that to $100,000 would be absurd. This is the type of wealth discrimination that allows for the rich to prosper at the exact expense of the average person.When breaking news occurs and a stock
I should be my responsibility to select the type of product I am interested to buy and to accept responsibility for the choice. Many individual stocks are even more risky. Do not take another freedom of choice. Make sure relevant information is provided and available but leave the decision up to the individuals.
I have watched the so called "meme" stocks have massive inflow over outflow and still drop like rocks. This is bizarre to me as a retail investor. I might be ignorant about this but I think it warrants investigation. Best, Richard
Regarding AMC class A. If retail owns the majority of the float how is this stock being manipulated unless it’s with synthetic shares. How does one even create such a thing. We need transparency in the market. This needs to investigated.
More regs are not necessary except on margin. Leave the small retail trader alone. The market is fixed enough by all the large players. You might want to regulate so called stocks such as DWAC. That is where the criminals are. Leave the traders alone with your rules. Not needed.
- Everyone should be able to choose any public investments that are right for him/her.
- Leveraged and inverse funds are important to investment strategies, especially during the period that the stock market is going down since they can hedge the investment portfolio to reduce loss and even enhanced return (if any).
Investors such as myself should be able to invest in leveraged funds without needing special processes or tests. Leveraged funds should be available to public regardless of education or net worth. Leveraged funds are far more safe investment vehicles when compared to stock options or cryptocurrency.
