I have been investing and managing my own funds in the stock market for over 20 years. I want to maintain the ability to freely invest my portfolio in any US or foreign security, included leverage funds, without arbitrary restrictions. I, like most investors, understand the elevated risk with leverage funds. However, leverage funds serve their purpose when used sporadically and carefully. I, like
I would like to freely invest in any funds I would like. if the fund activities are legal then everyone should have the right to choose what to invest. When we talk about risk, anything has risk.. Any stock can go to $0, too. I bought TQQQ and I like it. They invest in it for me. I just buy it and see my fund growing each day. Someday it goes down, too but that is ok. It will go back up.
I am opposed to restrictions on my right to invest in any public securities.
I have long made use of closed-end funds and own at some now. I can't imagine that such securities are considered riskier investments than stocks.
I have purchased leveraged and inverse funds on my own in the past as part of my own investment strategies. Currently, a financial advisor I use purchases such
No politician should vote to restrict our choices of personal investment especially given the track record of politicians using material non-public information with regularity for years. Politicians did not have the ethical standards to make it illegal all those years, I see no reason why they should try to restrict inverse products in front of a potential recession and stock market drop. I&#
I should be able to maintain the right to choose my own public investments and not be forced to go through any special process in order to do so. I understand the risks and would like to maintain that I freely choose my own variety of investments including inverse stocks. What is the real reason behind this proposed restriction? The veil to the truth is very opaque and I, for one see truth and
Leveraged ETFs and options can help investors reduce their risk and be a great tool when used properly. In many cases, these tools can reduce an investors risk overall portfolio risk. To exclude their use by everyday investors is to put many of them at a disadvantage and possibly an even more at risk position. Simply buying and holding individual stocks can be much more risky, and the equities
I oppose the restrictions on being able to buy public investments. I dont think I should have to take any type of test to see if I qualify to purchase any type of investment. I buy different types of investments including cryptos to diversify my investments. I have done quite well in the past with the stock market and plan on living off the investment returns through out my(our) retirement years
The Government already taxes profits on Crypto. I am not in support of this further encroachment of my rights to invest in alternative investments to act as a counterbalance to the overpriced stock market cause by the fed's QE*** purchases. First, Crypto should not be under the SEC as it is not a security, it is closer to a commodity. Second, the SEC is over-reaching it authority even if it
I not only buy cryptocurrency funds but I also buy cryptos/tokens. Also, along with these I also buy funds that track other asset classes, ETF's, bullion, both gold and silver, and gold and silver stocks. I buy large cap, small cap and mid cap equities. I buy and sell option contracts.
Why on earth are you considering infringing on the investments in cryptocurrency funds?!! Please
I strongly oppose the regulations. It is completely unfair and unethical to limit only certain members of the public from investing in what they want. The stock market should be available for everyone who wants to invest, not only for the wealthy. Regulators should not be able to determine what I am or am not able to invest my money in. I do not want or need these regulations, and they are
