I strongly oppose this rule of banning the 3x leverage ETF. Its so unfair to take away our normal peoples limited resources away from us. The big institutes and the rich have all resources to do their investments. The stock market is the most important way for us to grow our assets and 3x ETFs are an very important component or it. I strongly oppose the ban of 3x ETF. Its not fair for us.
As an investor and former stock broker, I am very opposed to your regulatory agency telling me and the general public what we can an can't invest in, and reserving these investments to specific individuals (ie: high wealth and those in the know) and restricting everyone else. You need to keep to more important matters and away from what Soros funded organizations want you to do. Remember
Inverse funds and leveraged funds are a valuable investment tool for Americans. I use them frequently. I am capable of educating myself. I fired my stock broker after he lost my money back in the bull market of the 1990s, and have been making my own investment decisions since that time. I fear government regulations are ever-expanding and will continue to restrict our rights. I oppose any
Public securities can not be considered public by restricting access to only a certain few. Leverage and inverse funds have been crucial to hedging beta risk during periods of high volatility in my portfolio. Building wealth has become hard enough for younger generations, and adding more barriers to entry past vanilla etf's, mutual funds, or single stocks disincentivizes building equity
Leveraged investments should be available to public investors, regulation on leveraged ETFs will not lower the risk of stock market investments but will rather lower the freedom of the market itself. Power will also shift from individuals to major institutions who are able to meet proposed measures. These institutions will then have even more power against common investors. Leverage will not go
It is very disturbing to hear that the FINRA is considering limiting the ability of the public to make its own decisions about investing or trading in the stock market. As so many Americans have finally figured out, the government does not serve the people, it serves the wealthy and the corporations. It would be a pity if you were to use your power to further disenfranchise the public from the
I fell that various Cryptocurrencies are understandable by me and may play a part in my future financial plans. I am a retired dentist who spends over six hours per work day studying various financial instruments. My total dollar value of all of my stock accounts is over $1,600,000. I believe that to limit my ability to trade in Cryptocurrencies puts me at a disadvantage compared to investors all
Leveraged ETFs and options have a legitimate place in many retail investor portfolios and can even reduce an investors risk when used appropriately. Excluding everyday investors is an unnecessary rule - if the intent is to protect investors, there are lower hanging fruit that are riskier - crypto exchanges, Las Vegas, Tesla stock, and buying a house in Austin TX all come to mind. Life is risky -
The public should be able to invest in leveraged and inverse funds, since this will permit them to hedge during times of market uncertainty and with future stock market declines. The excesses of the FED and US Government with over $10 Trillion increase in liquidity in the money supply over the past two years will lead to a great recession and major correction in the markets. The SEC proposed rule
Buyer Beware..... isn't that what it's all about? I've lost tons of money on supposedly reputable companies that were lying, and CEOs steal money all the time.... Ban the whole stock market if you must.... It gives no better odds than Las Vegas.... But don't think you know better than we do when you do nothing about the corporate malfeasance that goes on every day
