To whom it may concern, The know your customer rule, regulation BI and and the pending IRA rollover rules are sufficient to regulate investment options, advice and documentation regarding investment options, recommendations and relationships between advisors and clients. Putting further restrictions and limitations on clients access to investment products will disproportionately and negatively
SEC Approves Amendments Requiring Related Market Center Indicator in Non-Tape Reports Submitted to FINRA
Comments:I cant believe the FINRA what to interfere with the small investors making a few extra percentage points on their money. Leveraged Efts are one of the only places a small investor is on a level playing field in the marketplace.Sure theirs risk but thats what made America the land of opportunity. A Small investor can go long or short just like the futures without worrying about the
There is no good reason that investors of any kind should be segregated and barred from any type of public investment vehicles, especially not on account of available funds. This rule banning certain investors from inverse and leveraged investment vehicles would limit individual investment strategies and only benefit large institutions. It is fundamentally unfair and disrespectful to the
I have been a market professional for over 50 years, now retired). I advocate free use of levered and short (INVERSE) instruments as they offer hedging and leverage opportunities to every investor. This is needed in these volatile markets. The public are taught "never to sell" and yet we have seen several peiods in recent decades of index declines of 60+% (Nasdaq). It is vitally
I agree with the proposals as listed. I believe this would prevent or reduce the manipulation many believe the market is subject to at present. As such it would promote confidence within retail investors many of whom believe that institutional investors have made the market inherently unfair to them and as such retail may begin to disengage with investing. These proposals I believe would also
I have been utilizing leveraged and inverse ETF funds for many years in my trading/investing. They have been instrumental in my ability to consistently outperform the market averages. I use them both as an investment vehicle and occasionally as a hedge against my portfolio of mutual funds, non-leveraged ETFs and stocks. To no longer have access to these products would severely and negatively
img.snapshot {
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
height: auto;
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
.Report_TOC {
border:1px solid #cccccc;
padding:10px;
}
.Report_TOC ul li {
font-size:.75em;
line-height:1.6em;
margin-bottom:5px;
}
.source,
.notes,
.backtotop {
font-size:.75em;
line-height:1.6em;
}
.notes {
color:#777777;
}
.table-subheading {
I was disturbed to hear of proposed regulations that could limit my access to leveraged and inverse funds. I have used these products successfully, and especially appreciate the availability of inverse funds for short-term hedging needs. I would prefer being able to do this in my stock market account rather than being forced to use futures. I'm a responsible adult, I take
The regulations are guaranteed to harm investors. Investors do not need protection from themselves. Investors who invest in “complex” financial instruments are individuals who understand the relationship between risk and reward. The proposed regulations will not deter individuals from making financially risky decisions. Instead, the regulations will encourage individuals to invest in riskier
