To Whom May be Concerned, I am an educated investor and should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse ETFs. Not only I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I truly believe it's my choice and rights to invest on stocks or funds the way I want. That said, the
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am an individual investor to stock market in US, and part of my portfolio is consisted of leveraged ones. I like this measure, for it is good way to invest more than available cash or other asset and provide me opportunity to get better result. Please do not restrict this opportunity and let me keep doing what I have been for 10+ years.
Waiting for good news
I invested in XRP because of the barbaric SEC frivolously claiming to have legal authority to do things that they clearly dont. There is no reason for SEC to exist and all SEC employees should be blacklisted. SEC is consistently guilty of creating the very problems it was supposedly created to solve. No barriers to entry should exist for participation in the markets. They just want to reduce
Dear members of FINRA,
Although I do believe it's prudent to have educated public investors who want to partake in investments that are more complex than single stocks, it is extremely unfair to deny public investors, and only allow individuals who demonstrate a high net worth, access to more complex products that can be used to hedge one's investment risks in today's
I am an individual investor and I have been taking advantage of leveraged ETFs for some time. I limit use of leveraged ETF to one of the 3 major stock market indexes, where my portfolio has diversification. I understand leveraged ETFs may be volatile, but theres a lot of individual securities that are more volatile. Regulators should not place more restrictive rules on leveraged ETFs. All
I have been investing in the stock markets for over 50 years and am quite capable of making my own considered evaluations about a particular investment. I also study competent outside advice. I do not need or want your interference in my right to make those decisions, thank you very much! In other words, just bug off, Nanny, and stick to your job of rooting out the fraudulent practices in your
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds/ETFs. I am a middle-class American and have educated myself to understand different investment strategies - including the usage of leveraged ETFs. In my specific case I use leveraged ETFs to enhance my overall growth strategy - which is a mix of bonds, index funds, and individual company stock investments. For one I am
This is business in America. If you regulate trading in inverse and leveraged investment vehicles, you also need to regulate the buying of all stocks. Especially in times of bubbles which has been created by our monetary decision makers! Business does NOT only increase in value, it also goes down and if I wish, I believe a person should also be able to profit from poorly run businesses and also
This proposed rule is a bad idea. Making any investments is inherently risky - even the "blue chip" stocks have periods when they don't do well. Some people have a higher tolerance for risky investments than others. If they are willing to take the risks involved in buying into an investment, and they have the wherewithal to afford it, they should not be limited.
Also
I would suggest that if you are considering stiffer regulations on leveraged investments, you should take a look in other places where there is nothing but hot air underneath. Netflix, Rivian and hundreds more highly inflated stocks. The problem with that is given your belief that more government is better government would drive you there without that suggestion. These investments give the little
