I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds are important compositions of my portfolio. It makes investment more rewarding for many of us. Without these funds, I will have to invest in stock options instead when I want to use leverage. The restriction on my rights makes it unfair for me in comparison with investment agencies who have more resources,
I have recently established a brokerage account which was made available by my company. I have applied a portion of my 401k income towards leveraged funds. I am well aware of the risks and consider myself to be an informed investor. I do not believe I should have requirements imposed such as tests. Nor do I believe I require a cooling off period as I have already invested effort and expense into
I completely oppose restrictions on any leveraged ETFs for retail traders. This is our money and we demand the right to choose how we invest and trade. Are you going to restrict our ability to buy and sell options soon? Or how about simply prevent people from even trading stocks? Are you going to force us to put money in CDs only? One thing leads to another. The absurdity of preventing
Hello, I wish to keep the ability to use leveraged and inverse ETFs in my trading. I use these to protect my account. For example, I use the 2x leveraged inverse treasury ETF (symbol TBT) to protect bond holdings in my portfolio as interest rates rise. I have used inverse Nasdaq 100 leveraged ETF (symbol SQQQ) to protect my holdings in technology stocks when the market enters a down trend.
I'm appalled to hear that regulators want to restrict access to these investment products. Why is it that all of a sudden they are considered with complexity and investor protection when they weren't before. Do they fear that there isn't enough liquidity in the market to support the potential valuation of these products as the stock market continues to be volatile and
To apply these additional burdens to investors is absurd.
Why only allow the wealthy elites of society access to leveraged products?
Is FINRA my nanny? Can I not decide what risk is appropriate for my own family? Does one need to be so highly enlightened to understand levered products?
Will you start saying that Growth stocks are too risky and limit my ability to invest in them too? If not, why
This proposal is a deliberate attempt to take the right away from the small individual investor to have and purchase leveraged and inverse funds in their accounts to take away the small investors slow reaction time (in comparison to Wall Streets fast computers). Small investors don't always have time to react to market dips and crashes. Large firms with computerized buying and selling
I oppose further regulations to public investing. It is my humble opinion that instead of trying to implement radical and unprecedented regulations to restrict public trading that you focus your time and energy on educating the general public. I believe the regulations proposed by Rule #22-08 will help continue the current trend of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. I have been
Please do not limit people from buying these types of funds. Investors should be able to invest how they choose with their money, we understand the risks. This would allow only rich hedge funds to invest in these funds and would be very harmful to retail and normal investors. Please do not restrict the access to these tools. Investors already have to agree to the risks when they open an account
We should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
We shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
I use leverage funds as small part of my
