I believe investors should be able to choose what investments that they want to invest in. I used these investments as a hedge for my portfolio. I do think that the acknowledgement of risk and investment experience should play a role in whether investors can invest in leveraged products, but the approval process should be similar to the process for getting approval to trade stock options. It
Regulators should not restrict my ability to invest in public securities, including leveraged or inverse funds. These types of investments are a valuable addition to my portfolio and provide additional diversification. For example, I have acquired leveraged inverse funds a few months ago (since the downturn of the stock market), in order to protect the upside of previous investments and offset
I oppose the regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. I have the right to choose which public investments I want to invest in. This should not be taken away to benefit only those with high net worth or a privileged few. I do not believe any process needs to be implemented in order to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I already use them as important
I am opposed to the proposed rules adding restrictions on purchases of leveraged investment products for individual investors. Individual investors should have the ability to choose what strategies to utilize and the equities they purchase. Investing with leveraged and inverse ETFs provides me the ability to take advantage of market movement and sector activity without risk of concentrating into
Comments: To: FINRA,
I have been an active trader for many years using Leveraged and Inverse (L&I) Funds fairly successfully. I understand their limitations and risks from various literature/warnings and from my own experience. I strongly suggest that investors and brokerage firms do not need additional regulations to effectively use L&I Funds. This would only make these
It is my right to be able to purchase whatever financial assets I choose. My lack of money should not prevent me from participating in the same market as institutional investors. Institutional investors already face minimal regulation and are free to do whatever they would like, while retail investors are banned from day trading. Payment for order flow makes the issue even worse as only big
Dear FINRA rep,
Its about time that someone is finally addressing these horrible leveraged and inverse funds that ProShares offers to the public!
I have personally lost over $100,000 over the last 10 years. And I still have one that is down $85,000 in my stock account but just have not yet taken the losses yet. Every 2x or 3x fund eventually goes to zero and companies such as ProShares just does
First of all, thank you for letting me know about this. I know enough about leveraged and inverse funds and am constantly dealing with their risks. And I am constantly striving to acquire for a lot of knowledge and information. Therefore, I oppose any restrictions or other testing measures on my investment rights. Currently, the leveraged stocks I focus on invest in because they are made up of
I use the inverse leveraged products to hedge my risk. For example, I bought a share of Google upon the advice of a broker acquaintance. I was worried about the upcoming earnings report, but wanted to hold onto my stock for the split coming this Summer. So I bought an inverse leveraged product for a few days to lessen my risk during earnings season. I did have an issue with the ProShares UVXY ETF
I strongly disagree with making it harder to trade complex products, specifically leveraged and inverse funds. If I had to meet similar qualifications and go through much the same processes required for margin and options, then I would be tempted to simply go ahead and sign up for those as well or instead, which would expose me to dramatically higher risks than any ETF. It's quite likely
