This is not right sounds like more of what happened at GameStop. Everyday in the market we find reasons that the US Stock Exchange is not a free market system. We need to go back to when the people made the exchange and the United States the most free nation in the world. But it was by the means being discussed today. The people will not stand for anymore rule bending that only prospers those
I am an individual investor who has been investing in the stock market for over 40 years. I routinely utilize leveraged and inverse products to achieve my investment goals and hedge my investment risks. I am fully aware of the way in which these products operate and the risks inherent in utilizing them. My investment strategies would be severely compromised were these products no longer freely
All Stocks, ETF's, Funds or other investments are all subject to investment risk regardless of there class or structure. The choice is mine when making investment choices and must not be subject to Regulator involvement. The rules now on investment trading are already restrictive to a large degree.
Where were the Regulators when my pension was frozen during Company bankruptcy. Please
Comments: FINRA is just another expanding bureaucracy expanding to meet the needs of an expanding bureaucracy.
Their timing is propitious: just as "buy and hold" stock investors are about to get clobbered senseless by a prolonged recession, they want to close off all other alternatives.
I've never seen any point to FINRA and they really ought to be banished from having
I am a grown man who has invested for many years. I do not need a regulator telling me what I can and cannot do with my own money. These leveraged and inverse funds are no different than investing in growth stocks and other companies. All go up and go down. These funds are an important way that I hedge my portfolio. Please do not restrict my freedom.
I oppose any new regulation that is going to limit my ability to freely buy and sell shares of certain stock. As average middle class citizens trying to get by we are already getting stretched thin with the recent lowering of the $600 threshold (1099) with this current awful administration, and now this. Stop proposing measures that will only hurt average middle class citizens trying to better
Please protect my interest in leveraged and inverse funds. Inverse funds do a great deal of good in balancing a portfolio. I hope that future regulation widens access to securities, and does not prohibit access based on income, or net worth. I also hope that public access to investment products continues without the need for special testing or license to buy and sell stock and that public
I am asking that you do not take away the right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I am 80 yrs old, understand very well how the funds work as I have used them for many years, both losing and gaining just like any other stocks and funds. They have always been explained very well without needing further involvement with restrictions and education.
FINRA has implemented Form BR (Uniform Branch Office Registration Form) functionality enhancements for amendments to Form BR submissions for existing locations that will allow firms to account for the RSL designation by de-selecting a location’s registration for FINRA and the jurisdiction that accepts the RSL designation, while continuing to pre-select the location’s registration or notice filing in a jurisdiction or the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), or both, that has not accepted the RSL designation.
In recent years, FINRA created the first uniform National Senior Investor Protection Standards. On this episode, we hear an update on where those senior investor protection rules stand today, explore some of the real-world scenarios in their application and provide tips for some of the tricky conversations that financial professionals might face in connection to their application.
