Comments: I acknowledge that leveraged ETF's can be extremely volatile and not suitable for every investor but for should be available for those that choose them. There are extreme risks everywhere. It's up to each investor to manage their cash and risk tolerance. It's fine to put warning labels on the package but don't restrict the sale. I can illustrate many
Asa long as investors have access to information they should be allowed to invest in what every type of instrument there is available. I've invested in stocks, options and most disappointing are mutual funds that you think are managed for your benefit but in a market down turn they just hold there positions. What about big time investors who take peoples money invest in companies like
No we're not getting rid of people's rights to invest or makes money period. If you have a problem about it I can sit down and vote everyone on out. Matter of fact I can't wait for the future Mr to get home soon. I'm getting ready to hit the button for hi the heir is here and umm I don't have normal stocks etc lol ps federal reserves sec all that is in my name [REDACTED]
Really? I've been trading stocks, bonds, currencies, futures and actual treasury bonds since 1966. I've had a Series 7, 24 and 55. And you want to make me do what? This is a stupid regulation that prohibits me from doing what I want as an investor in public securities. I obviously understand risk, leverages and inverse funds. Restricting my ability to invest in these
Every body should be able to invest in the securities you propose to legislate. The information about these securities is widely available and well documented. In addition, the average person does not have the insider information that the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have in order to make millions off the stock market. As is the case, regulating the average American away from the
I feel it should be up to the investor to determine how he or she invest their hard earned money not a regulator. Some investors dont want to own individual stocks. They would rather just play what direction the market is trending at any particular month, quarter or year. These leveraged and inverse funds are extremely important to my investment strategies. I protects me from being exposed to
In an age in which we are watching the breakdown of traditional portfolios like the 60/40 fail to limit downside risk thanks to the correlation of stocks and bonds its important advisors have all the tools necessary to help their clients. Certainly these funds can be misused, misunderstood, or over-allocated to but that shouldnt prohibit the responsible use of such funds. I believe guidance, not
I should have the ability to choose any public investment as per my portfolio needs and it should not be restricted in any way. My personal strategy is to invest in 80% on high yield stocks, 10% on large cap and rest 10% for ultra pro/high returns index.
This restriction will hinder my ability to get good returns on my hard earned money which I am using to save for my kids education.
Dear FINRA administration,
I strongly urge you to allow all investors the opportunity to invest in leveraged and inverse fund classes. These funds can help regular Americans like myself have a simpler tool to invest money responsibly by using such funds to track indexes and hedge our investments in other stocks without having to use options and other more complex instruments. Thank you for taking
Please do not take away my right to invest in leveraged etfs. I understand the risk involved. I can buy apple stock or leveraged etfs and potentially lose every dollar I invest. One can only lose the amount of money they invest in leveraged etfs unlike options where your loss can be infinite. Why is this being targeted? I question the intentions behind this. Please do not overstep your reach!
