Executive Summary
As of February 22, 96, the following 87 issues joined the Nasdaq National Market®, bringing the total number of issues to 4,023:
Symbol
Company
Entry Date
Level
DHSM
Diagnostic Health Services, Inc.
1/22/96
500
DHSMW
IMPORTANT MAIL VOTE
OFFICERS, PARTNERS AND PROPRIETORS
TO: All NASD Members
LAST VOTING DATE IS NOVEMBER 3, 1986.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NASD members are invited to vote on a proposed amendment to the NASD Rules of Fair Practice that would require advertising and sales literature for publicly offered direct participation programs to be filed with the NASD's Advertising Department. The NASD will
Public Investments should be between the investor and the financial firm associated. The risks associated with investing are well known and explained by financial firms. Personal investments and retirement plans are controlled by the investor and investment retirement planners and critical to the investment success and well being of all. Based on Historical experience, especially lately,
I am asking that you do not take away the right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I am 80 yrs old, understand very well how the funds work as I have used them for many years, both losing and gaining just like any other stocks and funds. They have always been explained very well without needing further involvement with restrictions and education.
I want leveraged and inverse ETF's they are a important part of my investing and trading program. Do not take them away.
I do not trust government officials to be making these restrictions/regulations on us. It does not pass the smell test, it may well be proposed for nefarious political purposes.
Another suspicious circumstance is that the Mail informing o of this development arrived this afternoon, 5/9/22, and saying the deadline was today, 5/9/22. Hmmm, I wonder what that might be about? It is right now 7:
The Neutral Corner Topical Index; Volume 4 - 2008; Writing a Disciplinary Referral; Dispute Resolution news; SEC Rule Filing; SEC Rule Approval; Arbitration Awards: The Offset Option; Question and Answer; Arbitrator Tip
Hi,
I want to voice my opinion that I oppose any restrictions on my right to invest in a way that I deem appropriate for me. I don't need the government telling me what I can't and cannot invest in. It is my right to invest my hard-earned dollars in any way I choose; in many cases that is leveraged funds.
They have worked well for me in the past and I fully expect them to work
I oppose any restrictions to my right to invest as I see fit. Investments must remain available to all. The thought of imposing a screening process on individuals to limit investment access sounds like something you would hear in mainland China. I am well aware of the risks and limitations of leveraged and inverse funds as well as any investment I may choose. I do not want regulators oversight. I
Individual investors should be free to make their own investment choices in well regulated markets. Taking away or making it more difficult to invest in leveraged and inverse financial products could drive investors away from regulated markets and subject them to increased fraud. The risks associated with these products is already well documented in the prospectus. These types of investment
