Email: [email protected] Subject: Regulatory Notice 22-08 05/08/2022 Please allow leveraged and inverse funds to continue. Public investments should be available to all of the public and should not be restricted to only certain groups or individuals. I have a hard time understanding why restrictions are being considered for leveraged and inverse ETFs such as index funds while high risk stocks
I am a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) holder with more than ten years of investment experience. I'm capable to manage the investment risk in my own portfolio. I do not need the regulators to choose the investments that is right for me. I have my own investment strategies that matches my risk tolerance. Leveraged funds are important to my strategies. They help me hedge my
To whom it may concern,
Inverse funds have become one of the few way that I can protect myself from a move to the downside in the financial markets. Ive been in the market for the last 3 decades. Ive experienced several dramatic market sell offs during that time. I understand there is significant risk involved with investment in financial instruments. Risk is involved in every aspect of my life.
I made the choice to invest in leverage ETFs like TQQQ. I fully understand the risk of this type of investment and would like to till have the choice to invest in it for years. Investing in this type of security is in my investment strategy for the long term and would not like for this ability to be removed or have to prove that I am serious about investing in TQQQ. I understand why the
Dear sirs
I am testing a strategy using leveraged ETF's. My simulation shows it is feasible and successful. I have the following considerations:
1. ETF's are funds of many stock stocks, especially market ETF such as TQQQ. It has market risk but not the risk of individual companies. Sometimes, individual companies have higher risk than the market itself.
2. My strategy is short
Afternoon,
I was recently notified about some potential regulation that may impact the ability for ordinary people to invest in complex investments, particularly leveraged funds.
This is troubling to me. In the last 5 years I have been studying investment strategies and just recently took the series 65 with the hopes of helping other people with their investment goals. My studies have had a
SUGGESTED ROUTING:*
Corporate FinanceLegal & Compliance*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The NASD requests comment on amending the filing requirements of the Interpretation of the Board of Governors — Review of Corporate Financing to exempt offerings of Canadian issuers filed on proposed SEC Form F-9, and on Form F-
I strongly object to ANY regulation change affecting my personal choice to trade any/all market vehicles including leveraged funds. I DO understand leveraged fund risk, these funds along with risk also provide opportunity I rely upon. I see new requirements such as forced testing as an infringement on my U.S. FREEDOMS, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Chance, Freedom of Action. MY individual
High risk/high return investment products should not be privileged to only the very wealthy. Index funds as such give smaller investors access to a wider array of investment tools. Trading the product requires buyers to fill out some extra paperwork demonstrating their understanding of the risk. Limiting the risk that smaller investors take on but not that of high net worth individuals seems anti
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I do not believe any regulatory agent should be allowed to restrict any portion of the public from purchasing public investments. I do not believe one should have to pass a proficiency test to be allowed access to investing. Risk is an important component of any investment. Risk is not something that can be regulated away. Each individual investor
