I reject the proposed changes to existing rules for retail investors to invest in leverages and inverse funds. I would hope that the purpose of the rules and regulations you apply are to protect individuals and ensure fairness in the markets. Restricting the access of the masses to markets makes them less fair.
My experience as a small retail investor with multiple brokerages and their trading
On June 25, 2024, Progress Software released the MOVEit Transfer Critical Security Alert Bulletin (the Alert Bulletin) for CVE-2024-5806, a newly identified Critical Vulnerability, which was described as an Improper Authentication vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer, Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) module and could lead to Authentication Bypass.
Leveraged ETFs provide a convenient way for investors to have expanded exposure to an asset with less capital upfront. I understand the expanded risks of these instruments including volatility decay, but I feel that they suit my investment objectives of gaining expanded exposure to a diversified underlying index such as the S&P 500. I have done the math and assessed the risks, and I
I strongly oppose restrictions to my right to invest in any public investment, especially the leveraged index funds, that are particularly right and most suitable for me.
I am a retired Ph.D. Physicist who are good in math and has accumulated more than 40 years of experience in managing my own funds.
Among all available ETF funds which I have mostly invested in, I have found the 3x leveraged ETF
As Shareholders of this type of investment, we take our risks under no pressure to buy or own the leverage and inverse fund. I'm concerned about the special process or regulation, if it ever becomes the reality, it restricts our choice or the freedom to strategize our investment. Given the fact that the specific ETF, a high leverage investment type is high risk and we accepted it. If
The first Annual Meeting of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) members will be October 26, 2007.
The formal notice of the meeting, including the time and location, will be mailed on or about September 21, 2007. The individuals nominated by the former NASD Board of Governors and/or the Board of Directors of NYSE Group, Inc. for election to the FINRA Board of Governors (FINRA
I have been investing my own money from my self owned business for 50 years. I understand that these and all investments carry a risk and it is my responsibility to investigate the risk and judge what part of my assets I am able to risk. To limit my ability to invest in all products, including leveraged and inverse funds, also limits my ability to participate in the gains, when available. These
I strongly opposed restrictions to my right of investing the way I want. All public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged few. I know my investment portfolio and know how to manage the risk, I do not need these measures to impose upon me.
Leveraged funds are important to my investment strategies, and I fully understand leveraged funds and their risks. In
Limiting choices for active investors, especially leveraged instruments like options, futures and leveraged ETFs, is quite non American, and a sure fire way to create significant funds outflowing the markets. Allow investors and traders to make their own choices, based on their individual risk tolerance and willingness to diversify as they see fit. Contrary to common belief, leveraged instruments
What makes this country great is freedom! Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom to invest your money as you see fit. While I agree that an investor needs to understand the potential risks associated with investing (be that real estate, stocks, bonds, leveraged or inverse funds) the government SHOULD NOT regulate who can take these risks and who cannot. Leave our investing options
