Hello, I heard about the information that you potentially limit the trading of some ETFs using leveraged and reverse strategies. I strongly be against it, because I believe it's my right to choose the public investments that suit for my family and myself, not the regulators. Moreover, these ETFs are important to my investment strategies. So, please respect the rights of individual
Any politicians that go against the average Joe. Will lose votes. We the peopleh ave a right to invest. We the people hire The Government. We can replace you all. If you go hard against Us We will vote you out. Think about it. Informed Voter Sir Mark L Erwin 1st
It has been a matter of great satisfaction over the years to see how the cost have decreased and the options have increased or individuals who personally invest. Much of this has arisen as a result of competition in the markets and individual investor interest.
It saddens me to learn that the FINRA is seriously considering regulations that would reverse this trend by limiting investors through
I urge you NOT to restrict ordinary investors from trading leveraged and inverse ETFs for the following reasons:
1. Inverse and inverse leveraged ETFs are often the only vehicles available to ordinary investors to hedge their cash and retirement accounts in a down market, or even to profit from down markets. Wealthy investors have many means to do this. Taking these products away from ordinary
Individuals have a right to invest their money where and how they see fit. I do not have an issue with brokers issuing notices and warnings to investors before they invest in risky securities. However many of us have done their due diligence when it comes to research and risk analysis. The role of regulators in this particular case should be to INFORM, not restrict.
I do not need nor do I want a nanny to tell me what I can or can not do with my own money. It should not matter how much or how little I have to invest. It is none of your business whether I have educated myself in safe or responsible investing. What you should be policing is fraud and misleading investment information.
I should be able to choose my own investments. There is plenty of information available for understanding the risks and benefits of leveraged and inverse funds. They are an extremely important tool for hedging other investments. FINRA should not limit my ability to manage my own investments as I see fit. All public investments should be available for anyone to buy, sell or hold.
Public investments should be available to all investors, not just the privileged. I am capable to understanding the risks and making decisions on what is best for my portfolio. All financial decisions have risk, including doing nothing. There is sufficient information presently available in a variety of channels to educate the public of the risks which makes this legislation unnecessary and
I am writing as a self managed investor in several of the Proshares leveraged funds. I have invested in these funds for more than 3 years. I visit the Proshares website, read the prospectuses and past fund performance, the degree of leverage being offered and the risks involved. The information provided is comprehensive. I am hereby advocating to keep investments in Proshares leveraged funds
There is no reason a government body should have visibility to private law abiding citizens investments. It is a direct infringement of the 4th amendment on an individuals right to privacy. The only reason a government wants would to be use it as a political weapon.
To have access to that information an individual should be suspected or charged with a crime and a search warrant issued for access