I am fully capable of determining my own level of risk with investing and frankly find it insulting that the government would presume to limit my choices.
Instead of telling members of the public what they can do with their own money, perhaps spend more time reviewing what elected officials do with their money when combined with private information.
ACTION REQUIRED
Broker/Dealer and Investment Adviser Renewal Program
Payment Deadline: December 6, 2002
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Executive Representatives
Legal & Compliance
Operations
Registered Representatives
Registration
Senior
Restricting trading of leverage products is unwarranted. The brokerage companies give you ample information and disclosures about the risks. This type of product is fast moving and should be monitored throughout the day. It is a short-term trade. Overnight positions are extremely dangerous. A product that offers 2X or 3X the underlying index is not complicated. It merely has higher risk reward
I oppose any restrictions that may unnecessarily eliminate or appropriate restrictions on investments being considered under SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 to the extent that it provides a platform for intuitions to manipulate or gain advantage over retail investors. Free market capitalism should not be compromised by individuals fears or inability to educate oneself in an era of communication and
I am absolutely opposed to regulators choosing what I can/can't invest in for me. These measures do not need to be imposed on the public for their protection - it is a simple overreach of authority/power in an area it is not needed. Make educational materials readily available with updated information that allows people to make educated decisions and treat Americans like free adults instead
It's up to me to info myself as to what I think is best for my investments, inverse holding are a good way to huge against some losses. Personal liberty requires that all free people have a chose even if it's a mistake. The best think for any agency is to see that the information needed is made available and thats all.
IMPORTANT MAIL VOTE
OFFICERS, PARTNERS AND PROPRIETORS
TO: All NASD Members
LAST VOTING DATE IS DECEMBER 31, 1986.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NASD members are invited to vote on proposed new Article III, Section 42 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice. The proposed new rule would prohibit NASD members from effecting, directly or indirectly, over-the-counter transactions in a security as to which a trading
I would like clarification on a timeline for these changes to be implemented. How realistic is this change and how far along is it? In addition, do you have any information on what the history would look like and if any historical data will be freely available to us or is it going to be only on a go-forward basis?
SummaryLow-priced securities1 tend to be volatile and trade in low volumes. It may be difficult to find accurate information about them. There is a long history of bad actors exploiting these features to engage in fraudulent manipulations of low-priced securities. Frequently, these actors take advantage of trends and major events—such as the growth in cannabis-related businesses or the ongoing
IMPORTANT
TO: All NASD Members and Other Interested Persons
ATTN: Compliance and Sales Management Personnel
The NASD has noted that an increasing number of applications for registration have been found to be inaccurate or incomplete when compared with the applicant's disciplinary history contained in the Central Registration Depository (CRD) data base. Examples of inaccurate filings include
