I didn't go to war for the US Army to have regulators here tell me I am assuming more risk than I am trained to take with MY money.
Please do not restrict access to my investment funds. We investors are made fully aware of the risks associated with different investments, but these different levels of risk are needed for a diverse portfolio.
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds! I should be able to choose the public investments that are rigth for me and my family!
It is outrageous that you would deny individual investors the opportunity to leverage or hedge their own money the way they want to. Enough of your so-called protection. You are only interested in holding people back.
This action is not based on any evidence of misuse of leveraged ETFs. Arguably, this action would push investors into far riskier investments such as cryptocurrencies, margin trading, short term options, and penny stocks - why draw the line at leveraged ETFs? Utilizing a leveraged ETF tracking DOW30 and S&P500 as a small percentage of my portfolio helps me enhance my returns. Leveraged
I want you to know that leveraged and inverse funds are an extremely important part of my investment strategy.
These types of funds help me to find above average returns and dividends on my capital and I use them as a supplement to the bulk of my portfolio.
I value my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I did my research beforehand and decided what to buy. Making these available just increases values to citizens.
Leveraged ETFs are integral to generating returns when used responsibly. Attempting to eliminate them as an investment tool smacks of legislative overreach. Instead, focus on eliminating the proliferation of guns, which are literally being used to kill Americans every day!
It does not make sense to limit leveraged investments as long as I can get a mortgage for 20% or less down payment in an asset which can lose 50% in the matter of months during a recession. How can that be safer than using leveraged and inverse investments? I'll tell you that it's not, in fact is significantly less safer. What harm is it to limit inverse investments when
Every adult should have the right to invest and bear the consequences of his or her own actions and decisions. I oppose this new proposition.
