Dear Sirs,
In regards to the proposed ban on trading the ProShares funds, which include "inverse" tracking indices, I would like to express my discontent with any regulation that limits my freedom in trading financial instruments. Public investments, including "invers funds", need to be available for the general public to trade, not just privileged people
I cant believe you would attempt to limit my ability to invest in publically traded funds while allowing the continued manipulation of the market by the computer traded algorithimic front end trading which disadvantages the typical person investing and drives the market incessantly in one direction or the other from pure momentum. Why not reinstate some of the old rules such as the uptick rule
I recently joined the stock market. But I see there’s a lot of corruption with short sellers. I hope this can be straightened out so we have a fair market to do trading. Several of my friends are thinking about quitting trading all together if it doesn’t begin to be fair
Please do not remove the ability for me to trade leveraged funds. I am aware of the risks involved and am willing to take those risks for the potential gains. I shouldn't have to pass a test or have a certain amount of money or go through any other process to be able to trade these funds. I do not need the government to tell me how to do my investing! Thank you.
Dear FINRA,
I am hereby writing to object to the rule enhancement articulated on Regulatory Notice 22-08, which proposes a restriction on investors' ability to trade complex products and options.
I clearly understand your concern about investors making uninformed investment decisions on options and complex products specifically to leveraged or inverse exchange-traded products. However,
The Contra Executing Firm 20 Minute Compliance report card is a monthly status report that provides information on transactions in which a firm failed, as the Contra Firm to accept / decline / compare trades within 20 minutes after execution, in apparent violation of FINRA Rules 7230A(b) and/or 7330(b). It provides information about the number of trades that were accepted / declined / compared
There should not be any limitations for anyone wanting to trade or invest. We don't limit people other than age to drink, drive, or smoke they are far more risky than trading and investing. People know the dangers of smoking and yet people have a choice. Gambling is risky and people have a choice to gamble traders and investors should also have the chance to choose if its to risky for
Even though I am a relative small investor and by regulator standards may not be considered sophisticated enough to make leveraged or inverse trades, I believe that I should bear that risk and be able to participate in such trades in a timely manner. I am capable of evaluating such products and that should by my responsibly and authority. Current warnings and required statements by brokers are
Consider additional warnings on trading platforms so investors better understand the risks, but please DO NOT restrict trading in ProShares for retail investors. My husband and I invest carefully and have done quite well with ProShares funds in the past. Other investors' ignorance or carelessness should not be a reason to keep us and others like us from investing as we wish in the
My broker notified me re: a proposal that would force me to qualify to trade a public security focused on cryptocurrency. I oppose any type of qualification to trade these securities. I understand
cryptocurrency funds, such as BITO, and their risks, and i limit my total investment in such securities to about 1-2% of my portfolio. I know how to be cautious, and do not need government regulation