I find it troubling that you are considering making unreasonable restrictions on my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds, for several reasons. I should be able to make my own decisions without your blessings, you know nothing about me. Also this will severely hamper my ability to be successful with stock investing. I don't think anyone is more concerned about my financial
Do not restrict my personal right to choose which investments I place my capital in. My rights to Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness carry with it the freedom to choose as I see fit and accept the responsibility of the consequences of those choices. Restricting certain investments to the wealthy and connected elite of our country will only exacerbate the income gap. I use these leveraged funds
I am horrified and appalled that such a scam would even be suggested. There are trillions of dollars invested in leveraged and inverse etfs. In a bear market the inverse funds are the only things going up, as well you know. You cannot manipulate the market higher by effectively banning short selling, which is what this does. It will not work. As for me, if you institute these rules or anything
to whom it may concern. i oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged funds that are available for publics. leveraged funds play critical roles in my investment strategy and i am well aware of the risks in investing/trading in these funds. in fact, risks in buying these funds are too clear so that no tests or measurement of knowldege is required. hopefully FINRA regulators leave theses
I am a long time investor of Inverse leveraged ETF's. The decay risks are well understood and they are an important part of my portfolio, especially in hedging risk. It is my right to choose how to invest my money in these funds and I do not need the FINRA making more ridiculous rules to protect me from myself or creating additional barriers to freely move into and out of these funds at
I AM STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED NEW REGULATIONS CONCERNING LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS. THEY ARE AN EXCELLENT MEANS OF OBTAINING BETTER, ENHANCED RETURNS. I AM WELL AWARE OF THE RISKS INVOLVED. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO INVEST AS IT SEES FIT. THE GOVERNMENT MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH FREE ENTERPRISE. IT IS NOT A LEGITIMATE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT TO
I urge you, beg you really, not to move forward with these proposed regulations. My wife and I are retired, and depend on our investment income. I have been successfully investing in equity markets for decades now and leveraged funds have played a crucial role in that. I consider myself knowledgeable and experienced and am well aware of the risks involved. I strongly feel that I should be able to
I am well educated on the working of the stock market and it's various products, including leveraged and inverse funds. I don't need to pass a test or have the input of regulators on my investment choices. My retirement funds largely come from an annuity product at this time with minimal input of the investments. I use stocks, mutual funds and inverse funds to enhance and/or protect my
There are already several restrictions in place that make the public markets unfair towards those who are not institutional or professional traders as is demonstrated by the GME debacle. The risks of leveraged products are well advertised and there should not be government restrictions on those who choose to take those risks. Leveraged investments vehicles as those from ProShare/Direxion provide
I strongly oppose any new regulations regarding leveraged and inverse ETF's. I am not a high net worth individual. I depend heavily on these instruments to grow and secure my own retirement and savings. The risk I take is my own to manage, not anyone else's. Regulations are supposed to protect people like me, not reduce the tools and opportunities I have to improve my economic
