Comments: I fully support unrestricted access to 3x ETFs to individual traders.
However, I would mandate these funds to explain in more detail using real past data to demonstrate
1) how 3x effects occur over multi-days
2) how contango can erode the value and exactly how much erosion is occurring
3) and how often and under what criteria fund holdings are changed
3x funds are great, we just
Leveraged ETFs allow ordinary investors to tap into opportunities previously only accessible to the most wealthy, through managed funds.
Its been a game changer. Its available to those that wish to use them. Why regulate such a thing? Allow people to manage their money as they see fit.
While youre at it, lets allow folks to manage their social security funds as well. Ok. Make a list of
Greetings,
I am writing to inform you that I oppose any restriction on leveraged investing aside from warnings that they are not to be held long term. I believe that they are an invaluable tool that everyone should have access to, but not everyone should use. I am well informed and have determined that, considering my unique, highly risk-tolerant financial position, that these tools have great
I have a very diverse portfolio which includes a fund having some leveraged and inverse funds in it, but I do not manage the fund. However it has done well foe me even though it is quite volatile.. The amount invested in this fund may make up 2-3% of my total portfolio. I certainly see no reason why I should be denied access to such a fund. Please do not try to regulate what a person can and
I oppose limits and restrictions in my trading of leveraged and inverse securities. I am well aware of the risks associated with such products. Although they make up a small portion of my overall portfolio, I appreciate the diversity of products offered and the ability to hedge securities. I strongly oppose any further restrictions which may included testing, income or net worth limits, so called
A breakdown per market maker of short positions as well. More transparency of, or doing away with, dark pool transactions. When stocks are going 50+% through dps on a daily basis, that is not in keeping with the purpose. Short positions vs percentage of capital for accounts. A daily, dedicated transcript of increase/decrease per shorts/float.
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend Section 4 of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws to: (1) revise the fee for the Regulatory Element of continuing education (“CE”); (2) establish the fee for individuals who elect to maintain their qualification following the termination
This should not be decided by regulators. This should be a freedom decided by the investor whose money is at risk. Should penny stocks, crypto and other equally risky assets be banned as well? Should investors not have the right to buy or sell assets during certain market conditions that regulars deem unsafe for the investor? No, these are decisions for those with assets who have decided to take
I am an engineer by training and regularly handle economic calculations and risk assessment for my job as well as my personal activities. I should not be required to take training or pass tests to invest as I do now; much less be forced into cooling off periods related to my investment strategies. To be clear, I am also one of the folks that paid back all my college student loans and am sick and
Dear Sirs/Madame, I sincerely regret hearing that you are considering regulating my purchase of public investments! I should be able to invest in what I choose, not have regulators choose for me in a capitalistic country! I frequently invest in leveraged ETFS to moderate stock market volitility and put options for protection as well! I have been using these instruments for many years and
