It should be up to individual investors as to whether they what type of investment they chose without the proposed "red tape" despite known volatility. Many publicly traded companies have gone bankrupt or experienced huge fluctuations in stock prices and in those cases shareholders are not protected. Overall, investors should never have a concentration in any investment and no one
So now, you LOYAL CITIZENS WANT TO LIMIT MY FREEDOM OF USING MY INCOME. AND MAKE SURE NO ONE ELSE CAN *"""BUY THEIR WAY INTO POWER AS Y'ALL DID. SCARY BEING AT THE TOP WITH SKELETONS. WELL PASS THIS AND IT WONT BE LONG. NO, NO THREAT FROM ME. KARMA ALWAYS COMES FROM BEHIND U JUST LIKE A BIG CAT IN THE SHADOWS. AND YES I CAN SPIN AS FOOD AS YOU. ROME DID NOT
How Arrogant! You are putting up hurdles for no good reason. People should not need to pass a test, cool off or be forced to follow any nanny state idea. How little faith you have in people. This is insane and I guess it is finally time to organize and remove overbearing, outlandish, self serving humans. I bet you are doing this because of events like GME, wall street bets. You just want to stop
The ability to trade inverse and leveraged investment vehicles as well as closed end funds, volatility assets, stocks bonds and options are all equally important to me personally! Regulators should not be able to determine what I as a long term sophisticated investor should be able to trade. There is no reason to make me subject to any special process or approvals, I have been using them for a
What are you doing and why. This type of investment should not be only used by traders on wallstreet. All things are learned and anyone can learn how to use different investment strategies. WHY let only bankers steal on the short. This is obvious what you are trying to do. Protect bankers money. Well, you should BE working for us, any time you restrict what regular people can do you are screwing
a. Public investments should be able to all of the public, not just the privileged
b. I am well capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds together with the risks and certainly don't need special tests / process to pass before we can invest in these types of securities.
c. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.
d. It is better that regulators
Regulators,
I utilize proshares solutions to help my own accounts, my family's accounts, and my clients accounts. It allows for cheaper ways to help hedge to take advantage of markets and I am well aware of the dangers since proshares prospectuses are so good! This is not a segment of the market we should be going after. Leveraged and inverse funds have provided us solutions to HELP
I believe in more significant penalties and stricter timeliness for FTDs. The rules are so tight for retail investors but the market makers, brokers, large funds, etc. receive so much leeway. A retail trader should have even opportunities as it pertains to data as well. I believe these rule changes will assist with bringing better information to all. Thank you.
I believe FINRA's proposed limits try to address a problem that does not exist. Retail investors should have the freedom to decide what to do with their money and Direxion does a great job with several resources in their website to inform us about the risks of leverage investments.
I understand well what the risks are of investing in leveraged ETFs and they have made me a better investor
We as investors should be free to choose what we invest in including Leveraged/Non-leveraged ETFs. I don't want any barriers installed that would prevent me and my fellow investors from investing in these. We are solely responsible for OUR money and the risk we take with it is our business. I don't want altruists determining what is good for me. Further, Leveraged funds help
