Enough of this Nanny State regulation! Anyone investing in inverse and and leveraged funds knows they risk losing money the same as there is a risk with most investments. My biggest losses have been to taxes, sleazy lawyers, and government corruption over the years. Regulate the banks, brokers, lawyers, judges, Federal and local governments if you care about making life better for the average
It is in regard to FINRA and L&I. We don't need another regulation on the top of other regulations. My brokerage firm already provides ample warning regarding the risks. I find it sufficient trading these ETFs. I have been trading these ETFs past 25 years I know what I am doing and the risks. Government is not in the position to dictate what is good for me. No more
I oppose the proposal to restrict my right to invest in public investments, specifically leveraged and inverse funds. I invest in these types of funds regularly and fully understand the risks involved. My brokerage firm shows a notification requiring acceptance before allowing the transaction to be completed. I, and I alone, accept the risk for these investments. There is no need for
Every man and woman needs to be responsible for their own choices. It's up to them weather they want to take risk or not. The government can't even keep social security solvent for the next 50 years or balance a budget, they have no business telling us how to manage our finances. maybe if there was some financial risk management and retirement investing taught in school this
The public is not demanding further protections from you such as you are proposing, in fact, we are seeking more equal access and opportunities that are reserved for the very wealthy. I want to choose to invest in any vehicle and access the risks myself. This includes leveraged and inverse funds. If anything, any new regulation should address the publication of details about associated risks in
Hello, I very strongly oppose any restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me, and the risk that I take on - and I am comfortable with the level of risk that comes with investing in cryptocurrency funds. I am an experienced female investor with a diversified portfolio and cryptocurrency funds are an important piece of
I am appalled at the regulatory overreach being proposed here attempting to limit the ability of regular people like myself from investing in funds how I choose to and at the risk level I choose and am comfortable with. Investors like myself understand that funds, ETF's, leveraged or not contain risk and I do not need some ghost agency behind the curtain trying to make my decisions for me.
All investing comes with risk. By choosing to invest, we investors willingly assume that risk. Regulations should not be used as an to attempt to save unwise investors from themselves. The State allows lotteries and widespread sports betting, which inevitable causes more financial harm to unwise investors than leveraged and inverse funds. Thus, I see these proposed regulations as unnecessary
In FINRA staff’s survey of quantum computing use cases, several firms indicated that they are examining how they can benefit from quantum computers when conducting various activities, including trade execution, portfolio management, risk assessments and fraud detection.34 Additional firms indicated to FINRA that they are assessing the potential risk quantum computers may pose to current
Please do not remove the ability for me to trade leveraged funds. I am aware of the risks involved and am willing to take those risks for the potential gains. I shouldn't have to pass a test or have a certain amount of money or go through any other process to be able to trade these funds. I do not need the government to tell me how to do my investing! Thank you.
