TRACE research performed up until this point has been done on an independent basis by academics and researchers who used objective methodology in order to achieve their conclusions. These studies have concentrated on United States-based corporate bond data and what, if any, the impact of TRACE has been on liquidity and transparency.
I use these investments tactically to hedge, and they have been very helpful in mitigating risk and improve returns. I really don't appreciate being treated like a child just because I'm not high net worth. People have a right to make their own decisions. Your only job is to inform people objectively and without hyperbole. Once people have agreed to the risks, it is their responsibility
I have used leveraged and inverse funds many times as I grow my holdings, I don't want my ability to use these types of funds restricted. Please do not add another layer of regulation to the use of these funds. I would not be opposed to a better level of education of the risk of these funds, perhaps included in a simple and basic explanation for rookie investors to better understand the
Respected Regulators, Leveraged and inverse ETFs help me hedge my portfolio and I would really appreciate if you don't impose any rules such as passing a test before investing in such ETFs. Investors understand the risks these risks since the information is widely available. I would really appreciate if you let investors choose what works best for them. Thank you!
There's absolutely no reason to put restrictions on investing in leveraged and inverse funds. All investments carry risk, and those risks in this instance are NOT somehow hidden from the investor. If you start implementing restrictions, where does it end? Because the very same argument for them here, can be used elsewhere as well. Please do not take investing down that dead end road.
Please do not burden leveraged and inverse ETFs with more regulation. You will be taking my rights away to freely invest in these vehicles. I should be able to make my own choices and not be restricted by government excessive oversight. I shouldn't be required to pass a test to invest. Inverse funds are important to me to mitigate risk when investing and protecting against the downside. I
Everyone should have the ability to invest in leveraged investments as long as they understand the risks. Placing restrictions on the small investor creates disadvantages while large institutions take advantage of opportunities. Leveraged investments as long as they are not your entire portfolio allows the small investor to maximize profits without placing large amounts of capital at risk. Please
This ruling unfairly limits the ability to invest and profit or lose accordingly. Requiring education to the investor is reasonable but prohibiting access is rigging the game. It's understood that this environment carries heightened risk for these products. Putting a ruling like this in place now will restrict individuals access to these products in the future when risk is much lower,
What you propose is too broad and intrusive for a free market. These instruments have important legitimate uses. One can't completely eliminate risk from risk assets. There must be some role for personal responsibility. Rather focus on education, and perhaps limits for those who are over-leveraged on margin. Apart from that, taking occasional losses is how we learn to become better
Hello,
I should be able to invest in any public investment without regulation. Leveraged and inverse funds play an important role in my and my families investment strategy. Anytime I made a trade in an inverse or leveraged fund I get a warning and disclosure and have to check a box saying I agree and understand the risks associated with the fund. As an investor that is plenty of disclosure of the
