I partially trade with a US broker in order to have more access and freedom in my choice of investment vehicles. Making 'complex' funds only freely accessible to the elite and exorbitantly rich (like in the EU), whilst creating more and more hoops for regular people, will only limit opportunities for regular smaller investors. I should have the freedom to do with my own money as I wish
Please do NOT restrict my ability to trade leveraged and/or inverse funds. Inverse funds, particularly, are a way for small investors to protect themselves against market declines. Most of us can't afford to short stocks or Index funds, so inverse funds are the only way to profit in a down market. Taking away that option is a terrible idea. In addition, leveraged funds are a great help for
I Jason snyder do not agree or support changes to inverse leverage trading. Again the wealthy control the markets. You allowed the public to trade and lose on inverse funds for the entire rise of the market and now when the economy is going over a cliff due to terrible management from the top you want to take away the ability for the public to make gains from the market taking. Total manipulation
I am an individual trader with speculative positions in leveraged, reverse, index ETF's, which were established and are maintained through my retail brokerage account. I am extremely concerned about your proposed new regulations that would require brokers to qualify investors before allowing them to trade these instruments. I was well aware of the risks associated with trades of this type
The proposed regulations by FINRA would be have extremally detrimental effects on liquidity of trading of Inverse and leveraged ETFs. As any investor leveraged ETF knows, these are trading instruments, and provide easy access for individuals to take advantage of Market volatility, much more so than options or futures. Inverse ETFs are very useful in hedging long equity positions, providing
I have been trading stocks for the better part of 8years, I feel like we need the utmost transparency with regards to short interest data. I do not understand how a stock like AMC keeps getting hammered down or trades sideways on good news as well as millions of investors holding and buying more on the dips. There is definitely something sketchy going on, and unless there is more transparency I
(a) For purposes of applying any provision of the Rule 7600A Series that reflects a charge assessed, or credit provided, by the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility, a member may request that the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility aggregate its activity with the activity of its affiliates.
(1) A member requesting aggregation of affiliate activity shall be required to certify to the FINRA/
(a) For purposes of the Rule 6300B Series, unless the context requires otherwise:(1) "Exchange Act" or "SEA" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.(2) "Designated securities" means all NMS stocks as defined in Rule 600(b) of SEC Regulation NMS.(3) "Member" means a broker or dealer admitted to FINRA membership.(4) "Market Maker" means
(a) For purposes of the Rule 6300A Series, unless the context requires otherwise:(1) "Exchange Act" or "SEA" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.(2) "Designated securities" means all NMS stocks as defined in Rule 600(b) of SEC Regulation NMS.(3) "Member" means a broker or dealer admitted to FINRA membership.(4) "Market Maker" means
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, from 4 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. ET, the FINRA Test Facility (NTF) will be unavailable for testing FINRA Multi Product Platform (MPP) products.
This affects FINRA's Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE), FINRA's Alternative Display Facility (ADF) platform, and the OTC Reporting Facility (ORF).
FINRA's production systems are unaffected by
