Public investments should be available to all public as our families decide. There should be no special process as most of us are capable of understanding risks. Do not impose any additional measures on us. These are important for our investment strategies and should have no limitations placed. There may be little else common folks can use in difficult circumstances (like this well
I believe it is crucial that investment choices remain the prerogative of each individual investor and not relegated the privileged powerful who lobby government to restrict investment opportunities to that which only they control.
Just explain the risks involved and allow us adults to make our own allocations based on what is appropriate for our financial situations.
I regard the availability to
I strongly oppose regulators to choose what is right for me or my family to invest. I am considered well versed in investment options, however I object to being tested for my ability to understand and to pick my investment options. This is ridiculous. How much control do you want over us? Leave us alone and let us pick whatever option is right or appropriate for our goals. Leveraged funds give us
Good morning,
I would appreciate the ability to continue trading leveraged and inverse funds as part of my investment portfolio. I know the risks well and have made educated decisions about my investments. I would like to continue to do so. They have been valuable hedges in volatile times and have enhanced returns for me. I am the best person to make the decisions about which investments belong
Hello,
Please do not make it more difficult or impossible for small retail investors and traders to access inverse and leveraged etfs. I've been using these instruments for years to increase returns when markets move higher, and to capture downturns using inverse etfs. I trade options as well, which carry much higher risk than these etfs. Why would regulators seek to prevent retail
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I own an inverse fund that would be subject to the new FINRA 22-08 regulations if implemented. I object to those regulations. I fail to see why I or anyone else should have to jump throw new hoops to own any inverse fund. My reasons for owning it may be unorthodox I want to own something, less than 1% of my investments actually, that goes up when everything else crashes, so that I dont despair
Hi. I understand your concerns. But I believe that using criteria such as tests or high net worth to determine who is eligible to trade securities that are deemed "complex", such as leveraged ETFs, is unnecessary and can actually do more harm than good to my long-term financial security.
I can assure you that I am an active trader and that I know what I'm doing. I am
To whom it may concern,
DO NOT LIMIT MY RIGHT to invest in leveraged and inverse funds!! DO NOT IMPOSE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, COMPLICATIONS, PRIOR COURSES, FEES, MINIMUMS, ETC. before I can invest the way I see best for my families future. I regularly use leveraged and inverse funds to hedge the risk within my portfolio. I also used leveraged and inverse funds as well as inverse leveraged funds
I invest and trade in my Roth IRA account. The IRS prohibits any short positions in an IRA thus eliminating any opportunity of arbitrage except by using inverse mutual funds. Prohibiting investment in leveraged or inverse funds would cause investors like me great harm. I believe that I understand them well enough to avoid common pitfalls. In years past I held Series 6, 7 and 24 licenses and for a
