I believe i should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public and not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
I believe investors should be able to choose what investments that they want to invest in. I used these investments as a hedge for my portfolio. I do think that the acknowledgement of risk and investment experience should play a role in whether investors can invest in leveraged products, but the approval process should be similar to the process for getting approval to trade stock options. It
I oppose limitations on my investments of Leveraged and Inverse ETFs. It is patronizing to think these investments are complex. We investors understand the risk and we can make our own decisions on trading or not! And to even propose only high net worth investors should trade it is ridiculous; what you are trying to do is to only let the rich profit. It is segregationist and against our American
FINRA is introducing a new system for FINRA member firms to submit the FINRA Participant agreement and FINRA order form. Beginning January 31, 2022, FINRA Member firms will be required to use the Participant Data Management platform to perform the following functions for the TRACE, ORF or ADF facilities:
Submit, view, and amend the FINRA Participation Agreement;
View and modify access to the
TO: All NASD Members and Other Interested Persons
LAST DATE FOR COMMENTS: August 9, 1986.
The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD), is requesting comments on a proposed amendment to Section 2 of Schedule G of the NASD By-Laws. The proposed amendment would require NASD members to report transactions in listed securities executed between 4 p.m. and 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time to the
Comments: I am an active retail trader of leveraged ETFs, including inverse funds. I object to all proposed regulations that might require me to suspend my trading activity, including but not limited to minimum capital requirements, and regulations that may restrict execution of trading orders. Persons should be free to engage in speculation in financial markets and the disenfranchisement of any
It is my right to be able to purchase whatever financial assets I choose. My lack of money should not prevent me from participating in the same market as institutional investors. Institutional investors already face minimal regulation and are free to do whatever they would like, while retail investors are banned from day trading. Payment for order flow makes the issue even worse as only big
In regards for comments on 21-19 regarding short positions, here are my thoughts. * Every share should be tracked with unique identifier and should have the ability to be marked as lent out, unassigned/free, owned-lendable, or owned-not-lendable and be registered with a single central database to prevent duplication/ falsification of data. The ability to mark a share as owned-not-lendable shall
SEC Approves Access to Historic TRACE Data and Related Fees
Hi FINRA Committee Members, I don't believe it is fair that you are trying to regulate leveraged and inverse funds. I understand the risks in using them, and have used them successfully in the past. I find them to be easier trading vehicles than using options and I use them as a way to keep my portfolio hedged and to play short term swing trades during uncertain times. If others don't
