INFORMATIONAL
Bond Mutual Fund Volatility Ratings
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Advertising/Investment Companies
Executive Representatives
Legal & Compliance
Mutual Fund
Registered Representatives
Senior Management
Americans deserve the right to take risks. Currently Reddit traders can gamble on options which is much riskier than these funds.
That our prerogative to take risk and if we lose money thats part of investing.
We do not want or need this protection.
Focus on actual pump and dump frauds that are rampant across the industry or Cathie Wood promising 50% compounded annual returns on CNBC if you
I wish to maintain my current freedom to invest in public securities of my choosing. Though the notice means to reduce the risk for investors, it will have an echoing effect across asset classes that may not be fully realized. America is a land where we grant greater freedom than most. This freedom has allowed us to create one of the greatest economies of all time. The reduction of risk exposure
I certainly do not appreciate your attempt to restrict the public investments. If I choose to GIVE my money away, that is my choice, not yours. My inverse fund investing has helped hedge my losses in this most recent downturn, so why limit it? All investments carry risks and those risks are in your face, so to speak, when you make the investments. This is akin to free speech and should in no way
Please stop treating investor's like children in kindergarten that need to be protected from themselves -- like a typical Government agency, you think you know better. Stay out of my way - I'm entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - that means I can invest where I choose to, hopefully, obtain certain results. All stocks have risks and I understand what those
There is risk investing in the stock market already and we don't need the regulators to impose any restriction on our abilities to buy and sell any stocks, especially those that we may already have positions established. New regulations for existing stocks, including current leveraged and inverse funds, expose investors to unnecessary risks beyond our initial decisions to buy or sell.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to ALL of the public not just the wealthy. I should not have to go through any special process before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I occasionally use leverage and inverse funds for enhanced returns. This is
As an individual investor I trade many different leveraged ETFs and am fully aware of the risks. I have been trading for 20 years and am well educated about the markets. I also am a member of several stock market investment clubs. Please leave things the way they are now. Everyone should have the opportunity to invest as they see fit and we are all aware of the risks of trading and the potential
I would like to submit my opposition to the actions to restrict access to certain funds that are deemed "complex". The funds are the small investors only ability to hedge their accounts against certain market risks. Without them we are left exposed to unnecessary risks. It's a bad idea to restrict investment opportunities. The reality is that these types of funds may
I'm blessed to have been able to invest in many of the investments at risk of being able to invest in complex securities. This year with the public stock markets in a bear market my investments in interval funds, non-traded REITS, volatility linked ETFs and hedge funds have offset the risk of owning stocks. Limiting these investments further by imposing test requirements, net worth
