Leveraged and Inverse funds allow investors who are not wealthy enough to participate in hedge funds to manage their portfolio risks. By removing or limiting access to these funds FINRA would hurt us common investors and once again cater to the richest people and large institutions under the charade of protecting the common investor. All that is required is that a warning be provided every time
Writing this to let you know that I oppose the restrictions being considered to leveraged and inverse funds.
I like having these funds available to help with risk mitigation of my stock portfolio and to take measured exposure to offset growing inflation costs.
I am familiar with the inherent risks of using these funds and don't want to be forced to take a test to continue to use them
I am an individual trader that uses leveraged and inverse funds to help finance my retirement. I have used these funds since I retired some 4-1/2 years ago. I understand the risks of these funds as it is stated directly on the trading platform that I use, TD Ameritrade. I do not believe that over-regulating these funds that assist individual traders in building wealth to be the correct approach
Please do not restrict my ability to invest in the funds of my choice.
You can make videos that help everyone understand risks.
and urge investors and traders to view them.
I am not a school kid to take tests.
I have the ability to understand risks and limit my overall exposure to leaveraged funds.
Please do not limit certain investment to just rich and wealthy.
Please focus on voluntary
I oppose proposed restrictions to inverse and leveraged ETFS. The reason for my opposition is that they are useful tools for hedging and as well for magnified short term gains. If there is a particular sector, underlying commodity, or index that I want exposure to, these products help me meet my objectives and help me formulate strategies to meet the objectives i have laid out for myself. I
Leveraged ETF products have very clear notices to investors as it stands today. There is no confusion of the risks involved. Granted, it would be ill-advised for investors to use extensive margin while investing in leveraged ETFs, I still feel existing risks are clearly indicated and should be my choice.
Leveraged funds are an important part of my investment strategy when seeking enhanced
I wish to continue to have the freedom and flexibility to invest my money as I see fit. Disclosures are already provided on the risks of levered investment products and our education system thankfully teaches every American how to read. If I were an accredited investor I wouldn't NEED to take above average risk for a potential above average return.
This would further increase inequality
I have been using leveraged and inverse funds as a primary part of my trading strategy for 4 years now. The instruments do present risk to traders but investing is a risky endeavor, the risk of the products are documented, and these are adults choosing to trade using the instruments. Taking the options away, limits options for investors to manage their own risk/reward level. Much of the market is
I have been investing in TQQQ, a Proshares investment tool for over a year and have made a lot of money with it. It has an element of risk to it. I understand the core of how it is invested. I know that it is designed for profits on a daily basis. I am not a day trader but the platform clearly follows a pattern of the NASDAQ, and is predictable. With the Fidelity platform it is easy to get
My experience over the last several years has demonstrated the value in modest and moderate usage of leveraged ETFs for ordinary investors such as myself. Fully aware of the risks, I have made significant gains which would not have been possible otherwise. Requiring these additional steps would cut off all but the wealthy from the benefits of these assets, forcing investment in instruments which