I believe that restricting access to these investments what hurt far more people than just allowing the risk to be there. I believe the majority of investors understand that funds that offer higher returns come with higher risk. It is already made clear in the prospectuses of every fund. Please let us make our own decisions. Many of us have been in these funds for years and they are an important
I oppose government restriction on freely made choices to invest any fund or investment type a person wants provided the information regarding the risks of those investment vehicles are publicly available and/or provided at the time of purchase. I understand this might result in less sophisticated investors losing money but this is the risk one takes when one chooses to invest. I dont believe the
Another attempt for those in control to control the masses. No limitation should ever exist as this is often the only way to hedge market risk. I have a 401k that offers NO brokerage access and I contend leaves more market risk without the ability to play various sides with funds like these. They can protect coming market disasters that could be hard to mitigate otherwise; and allow easy
I understand you are considering passing a bill to limit my ability to invest in certain funds. I am against any bills that would limit that ability. One of the restrictions would be on leveraged funds for which I have several. Your restrictions will cause them to loose great value and that is not something I want affecting my personal wealth.
I understood the risks involved before I bought
It is the sole responsibility of the investor to choose securities that meets their assessed risk tolerance. It is the responsibility of the securities and brokerages to accurately publish the risks and potentials for their products. Thus, adding regulations beyond these fundamental purposes skew the landscape to play favoritism and hurt the market. Demanding a test or license or education
Hi there,
I'd like to say the right for investors to access all investment products is very important. The "complex" financial products seem high risk. But they allows investors to use them to hedge the stock investment. If the common investors are blocked from these "complex" products, they have to exposure all their investment in stock positions. It
There are already several restrictions in place that make the public markets unfair towards those who are not institutional or professional traders as is demonstrated by the GME debacle. The risks of leveraged products are well advertised and there should not be government restrictions on those who choose to take those risks. Leveraged investments vehicles as those from ProShare/Direxion provide
Hello,
I use leveraged ETFs as a limited part of my portfolio to seek enhanced returns. Its a very helpful way for me as a small investor to get some leverage otherwise not easily available to me. I understand that investing is inherently risky, and that it is my personal responsibility to understand the risks and rewards of any investment. I fully take this responsibility on myself, and do not
to whom it may concern. i oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged funds that are available for publics. leveraged funds play critical roles in my investment strategy and i am well aware of the risks in investing/trading in these funds. in fact, risks in buying these funds are too clear so that no tests or measurement of knowldege is required. hopefully FINRA regulators leave theses
I AM STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED NEW REGULATIONS CONCERNING LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS. THEY ARE AN EXCELLENT MEANS OF OBTAINING BETTER, ENHANCED RETURNS. I AM WELL AWARE OF THE RISKS INVOLVED. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO INVEST AS IT SEES FIT. THE GOVERNMENT MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH FREE ENTERPRISE. IT IS NOT A LEGITIMATE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT TO
