Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I use these type of funds to appropriately manage my risks verses specific high value and volatile stocks that are subject to adverse news and developments. Especially the NASDAQ stocks that are irrationally priced. I shouldn't have to go through any special process before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged
Hi there,
I'd like to say the right for investors to access all investment products is very important. The "complex" financial products seem high risk. But they allows investors to use them to hedge the stock investment. If the common investors are blocked from these "complex" products, they have to exposure all their investment in stock positions. It
There are already several restrictions in place that make the public markets unfair towards those who are not institutional or professional traders as is demonstrated by the GME debacle. The risks of leveraged products are well advertised and there should not be government restrictions on those who choose to take those risks. Leveraged investments vehicles as those from ProShare/Direxion provide
Hello,
I use leveraged ETFs as a limited part of my portfolio to seek enhanced returns. Its a very helpful way for me as a small investor to get some leverage otherwise not easily available to me. I understand that investing is inherently risky, and that it is my personal responsibility to understand the risks and rewards of any investment. I fully take this responsibility on myself, and do not
I believe that current disclosures and restrictions are adequate to inform me regarding risks of leveraged and inverse investments. Restricting the options to invest in such alternative and hedging options could, in fact, take away very important portfolio risk managements tools, which could trigger more volatility due to investors like myself selling positions they would like to hold longer
I have the capability of making my own investment decisions. A lot of people have investment strategies using these products and know the risks and do not put their life savings them.
I actually have a Series 7 license and understand the risks. There are others that do not have a license but are traders that make a living of trading. I do not feel the government needs to regulate. There is
I have invested in TQQQ. I found the investment is fair and just for individual investors who is willing to take the risk and reward as in every investment. I am an individual investor. I started investing in stocks more than 30 years ago. I found TQQQ is the best investment among all the ETFs as far as I know. I can understand the leverage without anyone tell me the risk and rewards. The cost is
The risks of investing are inherent in any fund or security. That is something made known when beginning to invest and heavily emphasized in literature to those considering investing. It's my responsibility as a investor to vet and understand the products I'm investing in. As part of that vetting process, I use leverage to manage my downside risk. It also constitutes a very
Thanks for taking the time to read this. I am against further restrictions against smaller investors. I should not have to take any additional classes or have any special authorization to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. I understand that these are higher risk investments and I believe that I have the same right to trade them as any large corporate investor. I shouldn't have to
I strongly oppose SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15, which is to unreasonably restrict my right and benefit to make the best of cryptocurrency ETFs as one of core segments of my ETF portofolio. With the recent growing liquidity for cryptocurrency, I cannot sense any peculiar risk characteristics in cryptocurrency ETFs, compared to more commodity ETFs or FX ETFs. Also, with the recent jump in inflation
