Do not become a fascistic body married to only allowing the already well-todo profit from leverage. When its obvious with Archaegos as just one example that you all are just as degenerate as the retail if not more grossly so. Stop trying to steal the working mans ability to make a buck, because your entire cottage industry is being exposed for just how fraudulent and slanted it is. Just like the
Hello just a few concerns about sec proposed rule#57 I believe it should be my choice not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right forme and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I also believe I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public
Leveraged and inverse ETFs are critically important hedging instruments for managing risk in cost-effective ways. Stripping individuals of the right to freely use and learn about these tools risks creating a market where valuation becomes disconnected from price (as the bets are less precise and more homogenous), and the market loses the ability to differentiate between successful and
This proposal is a blatant overreach. It is my right to invest when I want and how I want! I don't need nor want a baby sitter.
The investor should be able to choose how they invest without having to go through any special processes. These strategies are important for many strategies and without them could radically change the projected performance of our portfolios.
I'm opposed to this regulation. I feel we should have the right to choose our investments based on our own individual risk tolerances.
SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 I vehemently oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments. I am able to chose the public investments that are right for me and discuss with financial advisor as needed. These investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. There shouldnt be any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities
you ruin everything you touch.
I oppose the proposed rule. I, and I alone, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family without having to pass a test or go through any special process. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important part of my overall investment strategy. The proposed rule would restrict public investments to a privileged few and prohibit market access to many. No government,
Hello, I vehemently object to the proposed rule. I should have the full right to choose public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I object to any requirement that requires going through any special process before investing in complex products. Leverage and inverse funds are important tools for my
