I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I am writing to oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These funds are very important to my investment strategy and I shouldn't have to go through any special process to invest in these funds. Public investments should be available to all and not to just a few people. I fully understand the risks of leveraged funds and I use them as a hedge and also to
Restrictions are never the answer. Leveraged and inverse funds are not complex or difficult to understand and they are an important part of my wealth building strategy.
I strongly disagree with the proposed regulations to limit the public securities that individuals can purchase. Having access to leveraged and inverse products allows individuals to protect themselves as integral parts of their portfolios and create opportunities to build wealth. There are obviously risks associated with these products, as there are with all investments, but deciding on ones risk
You should not have to pass a test to invest.We do not need more government.It's especially important regulators hear from you in your own words. Please use the body of this email to customize your response.0
Although these funds may come with increased risk, I believe individual investors should be allowed to decide for themselves, if inverse and leverage funds are suitable for their investment strategy. They already come with warnings of the risk and individual investors should be responsible, not regulatory agencies, for making investment choices.
Thanks but I do not need your help in deciding what to invest in. I am fully capable of making investment decisions. Restrictions on my right to invest in public securities is a private matter between my wife and I.
To Whom it May Concern: I am writing in opposition to SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 which would place unduly burdensome restrictions on persons wishing to invest in leveraged an inverse funds. This rule would require passing a test, showing high net worth, "cooling off" periods and other impediments that would do nothing to address the risk that regulators perceive in these investments.
I believe that it is every investors right to freely access the entirety of the public investment market without unnecessary restrictions. Your proposed actions only hurt, (not help), the free, fair and open investment markets.
