A lesson learned - As a retired Quality Analyst from Lockheed Martin, trading an IRA, I've struggled with only trading long. I've learned with inverted ETFs, long is only half of the dynamic. Forced to take a cash tends to make one walk away from the market. This disengagement with the market and reengagement is dangerous. With the inverted ETFs one can stay engaged and work
To whom it may concern, Although regulations within a society are important, I disagree with regulators limiting an individual's ability to choose publicly traded investments. Leveraged and inverse funds carry increased risks, but it is an individual's right to invest in them. As an individual, I am perfectly capable of understanding these types of funds, however, if I choose to invest
I am an accredited investor, and I am asking you to reconsider restrictions on leveraged funds. My investing expenses would dramatically increase due to destruction of liquidity. I can move to options or other products but again they are more expensive. The proposed change increases investing costs for anyone making sensible portfolio choices. Leveraged funds are a powerful tool when properly
I have used ETF's that allow me to invest in movements in the to corn, soybeans, and oil for years. These allow a traditional investor to invest in a commodity without having to be a commodity trader or a holder of the actual commodity.
I LOVE funds that allow me to invest in LONG or SHORT positions against the DOW or Nasdaq indexes. This allows me to make money in any market
Regarding FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08, putting what said notice of preventing potential buyers of leveraged and inverse funds means to individuals already holding such positions: When and if valuations of normal Wall Street stocks crash or tank, those already holding positions of leveraged and inverse funds will either not be able to profit or recoup from potential loss. As those already
I'm 62 years old and I made my first stock purchase in 1978. I completely understand the risks associated with buying and selling listed securities, including inverse and leveraged funds. If those securities are reserved only for a select group of investors, the professionals and very wealthy have an even greater advantage in the public markets. It is especially important to have
The proposed additional regulation regarding limiting access and tradability of inverse, leveraged and volatility ETPs is nonsensical and plain wrong. Investing is a way for the masses to generate wealth, one small chunk at a time. Not everyone needs to be an accredited investor in order to be able to buy more complicated financial products than common stock and government bonds. Quite the
I oppose restrictions or regulations that inhibit my investment choices. I intentionally choose leveraged or inverse funds as a part of my portfolio. I want to be able to buy or sell those funds at any time of my choosing. These funds have risks like other funds or stocks. We don't know the future. But we all have our own hunches as to what might happen. Noone should have the right to make
Comments:I am a long time investor and have used various brokerage houses for my stock portfolio. I have traded both leveraged and inverse ETFs. It has been my experience that major brokerage houses have advised me of the caution that should be taken in trading these Funds. In addition Direxion has excellent tutorials on the use of these Funds. The use of these Funds is no different than the use
Most people get that investing is risky. If they passed high school, they'll have learned about things like the Great Depression where people lost everything on their stock investments. If anything, the burden should be on the organizations doing a fundraise to provide all the information that people need to make smart decisions and establish that they aren't going to pull the
